Only the left has signed this so far (Bill Ranking)
H.R. 10140 · 119th Congress (2025-2026)
2 members · Left 1 · Center 1 · Right 0 (Bill Ranking)
| Sponsor | Rep. Dingell, Debbie (D-MI) (Introduced 08/24/2026) |
|---|---|
| Sponsor Voting Record | Lean left · DW-NOMINATE -0.40 · measured from every roll-call vote this member has cast (voteview.com) (Sponsor Ranking) |
| Support |
LLLCLRR support across the spectrum: 2 members signed on (Bill Ranking) this bill: sponsor + current cosponsors, each once |
| Committees | House - Natural Resources Committee |
| Latest Action | 08/24/2026 Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources. |
| Roll Call Votes | There have been no roll call votes |
| Source | view on congress.gov → |
A summary is in progress.
119 HR 10140 IH: Sunscreen in Parks Findings Act of 2026 U.S. House of Representatives 2026-08-24 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I119th CONGRESS2d SessionH. R. 10140IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESAugust 24, 2026Mrs. Dingell (for herself and Mr. Lawler) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural ResourcesA BILLTo direct the National Park Service to pursue options for the provision of mineral-based, broad-spectrum sunscreen or other protective methods at low or no cost in national parks, and for other purposes.
1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Sunscreen in Parks Findings Act of 2026 or the SPF Act of 2026.
2.FindingsCongress finds the following: (1)The National Cancer Institute estimates there will be approximately 100,640 new cases of skin melanomas and 8,290 related deaths from skin cancer in the United States in 2024. (2)People of all skin colors are at risk for skin cancer, skin aging, and sunburn from spending time in the sun. (3)Sunscreen is most effective at protecting against skin cancer rates when paired with other protective methods, including— (A)limiting time in the sun, specifically when rays are most intense; and (B)wearing protective clothing to cover exposed skin. (4)The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sunscreen products. According to the FDA, only broad-spectrum sunscreens with a sun protection factor (SPF) of at least 15 help to protect from skin cancer and early aging. (5)The National Park Service recommends that visitors apply nonnanotized, mineral-based sunscreens, which provide strong sun protection with few health concerns. (6)According to the 2020 National Center for Health Statistics National Health Interview Survey, about 69 percent of Americans used sunscreen at least occasionally in 2020, up from 60 percent in 2000. (7)A 2022 American Academy of Dermatology survey found that many United States adults have room for improvement in terms of sun protection and found the following: (A)67 percent incorrectly believed that SPF 30 sunscreen offers twice as much protection as SPF 15 sunscreen. (B)65 percent said they often forget to reapply sunscreen. (C)43 percent were unaware that shade protects a person from ultraviolet (UV) rays. (8)Some States, including Colorado, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island, have provided free sunscreen stations for visitors to State parks. (9)A 2022 George Mason University report to the National Park Service recommends that national parks stock sunscreen and sun-protective UPF clothing in prominent displays with signage on recommended sun protection behaviors.
3.Report to Congress (a)In generalNot later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the National Park Service shall provide to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a report outlining options for the provision of mineral-based, broad-spectrum sunscreen and other sun protection methods at low or no cost in national parks, including— (1)public-private partnerships; (2)partnerships with nonprofit organizations; (3)unobligated funding within the National Park Service budget; and (4)any other option that could support the provision of free mineral-based sunscreen and other low-cost protective methods to park visitors. (b)Content of reportThe report required under subsection (a) shall address topics including— (1)the potential environmental impacts of any sunscreen provided in the national parks; (2)the equitable usability of sunscreen provided for park visitors, specifically the ability of sunscreen to blend with all skin tones; and (3)a plan for increasing awareness in the parks regarding the importance of sun protection to prevent skin damage and skin cancer. (c)Legislative recommendationsThe report required under subsection (a) shall include recommendations for measures that Congress can take to support the effort for the National Park Service to increase options for sun protection in national parks.
The bill's own words, from our database (synced from the GPO BILLS XML); paragraph breaks added at the bill's section boundaries, nothing else changed.
| Date | Chamber | All Actions |
|---|---|---|
| 08/24/2026 | Library of Congress | Introduced in House |
| 08/24/2026 | Library of Congress | Introduced in House |
| 08/24/2026 | House floor actions | Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources. |
| Title Type | Title |
|---|---|
| Display Title | SPF Act of 2026 |
| Short Title(s) as Introduced | SPF Act of 2026 |
| Short Title(s) as Introduced | Sunscreen in Parks Findings Act of 2026 |
| Official Title as Introduced | To direct the National Park Service to pursue options for the provision of mineral-based, broad-spectrum sunscreen or other protective methods at low or no cost in national parks, and for other purposes. |
There are no amendments to this bill.
* = Original cosponsor
| Committee | Activity |
|---|---|
| House - Natural Resources Committee | 08/24/2026 Referred To |
No related bill information was received for H.R. 10140.
Policy Area: —
No legislative subjects have been assigned yet.
All data on this page comes from our own database (legislation.congress_* tables), synced daily from the GPO govinfo BILLSTATUS and BILLS collections. Formatted after congress.gov; nothing is generated. Member placement is their DW-NOMINATE score (voteview.com, Lewis et al.) - a measurement of roll-call voting behavior, not our judgement. Buckets: Left below −0.50 · Lean Left to −0.25 · Center to +0.25 · Lean Right to +0.50 · Right above +0.50. The bill's Support meter aggregates the people who signed the bill - sponsor and current cosponsors, each counted once - nothing else.