Congressional Legislation · bill 119hr1917 · built from our database

Both sides have signed this (Bill Ranking)

Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025

H.R. 1917 · 119th Congress (2025-2026)

H.R. 1917119TH CONGRESSINTRODUCED 03/06/2025REP. DINGELLD-MI · SPONSORLeft: no (Sponsor Ranking)Lean left: DW-NOMINATE -0.40 (Sponsor Ranking)Center: no (Sponsor Ranking)Lean right: no (Sponsor Ranking)Right: no (Sponsor Ranking)LEAN LEFT(SPONSOR RANKING)ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

7 members · Left 3 · Center 1 · Right 3 (Bill Ranking)

SponsorRep. Dingell, Debbie (D-MI) (Introduced 03/06/2025)
Sponsor Voting RecordLean left · DW-NOMINATE -0.40 · measured from every roll-call vote this member has cast (voteview.com) (Sponsor Ranking)
Support
LLLCLRR

support across the spectrum: 7 members signed on (Bill Ranking) this bill: sponsor + current cosponsors, each once

CommitteesSenate - Environment and Public Works Committee; House - Natural Resources Committee; House - Natural Resources Committee; House - Natural Resources Committee; House - Natural Resources Committee
Latest Action07/23/2025 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Roll Call Votes1
Sourceview on congress.gov →
IntroducedPassed HousePassed SenateResolving DifferencesTo PresidentBecame Law

Summary (1)

Introduced in House (03/06/2025)

Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025

This bill provides statutory authority for a program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) for the mass marking of hatchery-produced fish in the Great Lakes basin. Mass marking is the practice of tagging large numbers of hatchery-produced fish in order to distinguish them from the wild fish population. The FWS initiated the program in 2010 on a limited scale. Under the existing program, the FWS (1) tags hatchery-produced fish stocked in the Great Lakes, and (2) produces data used by state and tribal fish management agencies to make management decisions regarding Great Lakes fisheries.

This bill allows the FWS, in carrying out the program, to (1) purchase items to support and carry out tagging and tag recovery operations on a greater scale, and (2) hire additional personnel.

The FWS must make the data collected under the program available to applicable federal, state, and tribal fish management agencies to

  • increase the understanding of the outcomes of management action;
  • assist in meeting the restoration objectives of the Great Lakes;
  • assist in balancing predators and prey;
  • support and improve the economic status of tribal, recreational, and commercial fisheries; and
  • assist in evaluating the effectiveness of habitat restoration efforts in the Great Lakes.

Text (4)

Engrossed in House (EH)

119 HR 1917 EH: Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025 U.S. House of Representatives text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. IB 119th CONGRESS1st Session H. R. 1917

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AN ACT To establish the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program, and for other purposes.

1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025.

2.FindingsCongress finds that— (1)the Great Lakes have experienced rapid changes in recent years due to— (A)the introduction of multiple aquatic invasive species; (B)alterations in the food web; and (C)decreases in the abundance of prey species; (2)due to rapid biological change in the Great Lakes, the Great Lakes need a collaborative, science-based program to assist in making management actions regarding fish stocking rates, the rehabilitation of important fish species, and habitat restoration; (3)the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, and Wisconsin and Indian Tribes in those States, working through the Council of Lake Committees of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, have identified that mass marking is— (A)a precise tool to keep hatchery-produced fish in balance with wild fish; and (B)essential to achieving fishery management and research objectives through producing a better understanding of— (i)the quantity of hatchery produced fish compared to wild fish in the Great Lakes; (ii)the effectiveness of hatchery operations; and (iii)the effectiveness of fishery management actions; (4)the mass marking program of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in the Great Lakes— (A)was initiated in 2010 on a limited scale; (B)annually tags approximately 9,000,000 to 11,000,000 of the hatchery-produced fish stocked in the Great Lakes; (C)is a basinwide cooperative effort among the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Indian Tribes, and State management agencies; and (D)produces data used by State and Tribal fish management agencies to make management decisions regarding Great Lakes fisheries; (5)annually, Federal, State, and Tribal agencies stock approximately 21,000,000 hatchery-produced fish in the Great Lakes to support— (A)native species recovery; and (B)recreational and commercial fishing; (6)mass marking of hatchery-produced fish, using automated technology, is an efficient method of implementing a collaborative, science-based fishery program; and (7)the Great Lakes are an important and valued resource that— (A)supports a robust regional economy valued at more than $7,000,000,000; and (B)provides stability to the economy of the United States.

3.DefinitionsIn this Act: (1)DirectorThe term Director means the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. (2)ProgramThe term Program means the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program established by section 4(a).

4.Great Lakes mass marking program (a)In generalTo assist in determining the effectiveness of hatchery operations and fisheries management actions and to support Great Lakes fisheries, there is established within the United States Fish and Wildlife Service a program for the mass marking of hatchery-produced fish in the Great Lakes basin, to be known as the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program. (b)Authorized actionsIn carrying out the Program, the Director may— (1)purchase capital and expendable equipment, fish tags, and other items necessary to support and carry out tagging and tag recovery operations, including data processing and data dissemination relating to those operations; and (2)hire additional personnel, as necessary. (c)Required collaborationIn carrying out the Program, the Director shall collaborate with applicable Federal, State, and Tribal fish management agencies, the Council of Lake Committees of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, and signatories to the Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries. (d)Availability of dataThe Director shall make the data collected under the Program available to applicable Federal, State, and Tribal fish management agencies— (1)to increase the understanding of the outcomes of management action; (2)to assist in meeting the restoration objectives of the Great Lakes, including the fish community objectives and fish management plans described in the Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries; (3)to assist in balancing predators and prey; (4)to support and improve the economic status of Tribal, recreational, and commercial fisheries; and (5)to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of habitat restoration efforts in the Great Lakes.

5.Authorization of appropriationsThere is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the Program $2,700,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030. Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2025.Kevin F. McCumber,Clerk.

Introduced in House (IH)

119 HR 1917 IH: Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025 U.S. House of Representatives 2025-03-06 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I119th CONGRESS1st SessionH. R. 1917IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESMarch 6, 2025Mrs. Dingell (for herself, Mr. Huizenga, and Mr. Walberg) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural ResourcesA BILLTo establish the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program, and for other purposes.

1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025.

2.FindingsCongress finds that— (1)the Great Lakes have experienced rapid changes in recent years due to— (A)the introduction of multiple aquatic invasive species; (B)alterations in the food web; and (C)decreases in the abundance of prey species; (2)due to rapid biological change in the Great Lakes, the Great Lakes need a collaborative, science-based program to assist in making management actions regarding fish stocking rates, the rehabilitation of important fish species, and habitat restoration; (3)the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, and Wisconsin and Indian Tribes in those States, working through the Council of Lake Committees of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, have identified that mass marking is— (A)a precise tool to keep hatchery-produced fish in balance with wild fish; and (B)essential to achieving fishery management and research objectives through producing a better understanding of— (i)the quantity of hatchery produced fish compared to wild fish in the Great Lakes; (ii)the effectiveness of hatchery operations; and (iii)the effectiveness of fishery management actions; (4)the mass marking program of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in the Great Lakes— (A)was initiated in 2010 on a limited scale; (B)annually tags approximately 9,000,000 to 11,000,000 of the hatchery-produced fish stocked in the Great Lakes; (C)is a basinwide cooperative effort among the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Indian Tribes, and State management agencies; and (D)produces data used by State and Tribal fish management agencies to make management decisions regarding Great Lakes fisheries; (5)annually, Federal, State, and Tribal agencies stock approximately 21,000,000 hatchery-produced fish in the Great Lakes to support— (A)native species recovery; and (B)recreational and commercial fishing; (6)mass marking of hatchery-produced fish, using automated technology, is an efficient method of implementing a collaborative, science-based fishery program; and (7)the Great Lakes are an important and valued resource that— (A)supports a robust regional economy valued at more than $7,000,000,000; and (B)provides stability to the economy of the United States.

3.DefinitionsIn this Act: (1)DirectorThe term Director means the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. (2)ProgramThe term Program means the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program established by section 4(a).

4.Great Lakes mass marking program (a)In generalTo assist in determining the effectiveness of hatchery operations and fisheries management actions and to support Great Lakes fisheries, there is established within the United States Fish and Wildlife Service a program for the mass marking of hatchery-produced fish in the Great Lakes basin, to be known as the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program. (b)Authorized actionsIn carrying out the Program, the Director may— (1)purchase capital and expendable equipment, fish tags, and other items necessary to support and carry out tagging and tag recovery operations, including data processing and data dissemination relating to those operations; and (2)hire additional personnel, as necessary. (c)Required collaborationIn carrying out the Program, the Director shall collaborate with applicable Federal, State, and Tribal fish management agencies, the Council of Lake Committees of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, and signatories to the Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries. (d)Availability of dataThe Director shall make the data collected under the Program available to applicable Federal, State, and Tribal fish management agencies— (1)to increase the understanding of the outcomes of management action; (2)to assist in meeting the restoration objectives of the Great Lakes, including the fish community objectives and fish management plans described in the Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries; (3)to assist in balancing predators and prey; (4)to support and improve the economic status of Tribal, recreational, and commercial fisheries; and (5)to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of habitat restoration efforts in the Great Lakes.

5.Authorization of appropriationsThere is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the Program $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030.

Referred in Senate (RFS)

119 HR 1917 : Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025 U.S. House of Representatives 2025-07-23 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. IIB119th CONGRESS1st SessionH. R. 1917IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESJuly 23, 2025Received; read twice and referred to theCommittee on Environment and Public WorksAN ACTTo establish the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025.2.FindingsCongress finds that—(1)the Great Lakes have experienced rapid changes in recent years due to—(A)the introduction of multiple aquatic invasive species;(B)alterations in the food web; and(C)decreases in the abundance of prey species;(2)due to rapid biological change in the Great Lakes, the Great Lakes need a collaborative, science-based program to assist in making management actions regarding fish stocking rates, the rehabilitation of important fish species, and habitat restoration;(3)the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, and Wisconsin and Indian Tribes in those States, working through the Council of Lake Committees of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, have identified that mass marking is—(A)a precise tool to keep hatchery-produced fish in balance with wild fish; and(B)essential to achieving fishery management and research objectives through producing a better understanding of—(i)the quantity of hatchery produced fish compared to wild fish in the Great Lakes;(ii)the effectiveness of hatchery operations; and(iii)the effectiveness of fishery management actions;(4)the mass marking program of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in the Great Lakes—(A)was initiated in 2010 on a limited scale;(B)annually tags approximately 9,000,000 to 11,000,000 of the hatchery-produced fish stocked in the Great Lakes;(C)is a basinwide cooperative effort among the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Indian Tribes, and State management agencies; and(D)produces data used by State and Tribal fish management agencies to make management decisions regarding Great Lakes fisheries;(5)annually, Federal, State, and Tribal agencies stock approximately 21,000,000 hatchery-produced fish in the Great Lakes to support—(A)native species recovery; and(B)recreational and commercial fishing;(6)mass marking of hatchery-produced fish, using automated technology, is an efficient method of implementing a collaborative, science-based fishery program; and(7)the Great Lakes are an important and valued resource that—(A)supports a robust regional economy valued at more than $7,000,000,000; and(B)provides stability to the economy of the United States.3.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)DirectorThe term Director means the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.(2)ProgramThe term Program means the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program established by section 4(a).4.Great Lakes mass marking program(a)In generalTo assist in determining the effectiveness of hatchery operations and fisheries management actions and to support Great Lakes fisheries, there is established within the United States Fish and Wildlife Service a program for the mass marking of hatchery-produced fish in the Great Lakes basin, to be known as the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program.(b)Authorized actionsIn carrying out the Program, the Director may—(1)purchase capital and expendable equipment, fish tags, and other items necessary to support and carry out tagging and tag recovery operations, including data processing and data dissemination relating to those operations; and(2)hire additional personnel, as necessary.(c)Required collaborationIn carrying out the Program, the Director shall collaborate with applicable Federal, State, and Tribal fish management agencies, the Council of Lake Committees of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, and signatories to the Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries.(d)Availability of dataThe Director shall make the data collected under the Program available to applicable Federal, State, and Tribal fish management agencies—(1)to increase the understanding of the outcomes of management action;(2)to assist in meeting the restoration objectives of the Great Lakes, including the fish community objectives and fish management plans described in the Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries;(3)to assist in balancing predators and prey;(4)to support and improve the economic status of Tribal, recreational, and commercial fisheries; and(5)to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of habitat restoration efforts in the Great Lakes.5.Authorization of appropriationsThere is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the Program $2,700,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030.Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2025.Kevin F. McCumber,Clerk.

Reported in House (RH)

119 HR 1917 RH: Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025 U.S. House of Representatives 2025-07-21 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. IBUnion Calendar No. 171119th CONGRESS1st SessionH. R. 1917[Report No. 119–210]IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESMarch 6, 2025Mrs. Dingell (for herself, Mr. Huizenga, and Mr. Walberg) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural ResourcesJuly 21, 2025Additional sponsors: Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Bergman, Ms. Kaptur, and Mr. QuigleyJuly 21, 2025Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printedStrike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italicFor text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on March 6, 2025A BILLTo establish the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025.2.FindingsCongress finds that—(1)the Great Lakes have experienced rapid changes in recent years due to—(A)the introduction of multiple aquatic invasive species;(B)alterations in the food web; and(C)decreases in the abundance of prey species;(2)due to rapid biological change in the Great Lakes, the Great Lakes need a collaborative, science-based program to assist in making management actions regarding fish stocking rates, the rehabilitation of important fish species, and habitat restoration;(3)the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, and Wisconsin and Indian Tribes in those States, working through the Council of Lake Committees of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, have identified that mass marking is—(A)a precise tool to keep hatchery-produced fish in balance with wild fish; and(B)essential to achieving fishery management and research objectives through producing a better understanding of—(i)the quantity of hatchery produced fish compared to wild fish in the Great Lakes;(ii)the effectiveness of hatchery operations; and(iii)the effectiveness of fishery management actions;(4)the mass marking program of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in the Great Lakes—(A)was initiated in 2010 on a limited scale;(B)annually tags approximately 9,000,000 to 11,000,000 of the hatchery-produced fish stocked in the Great Lakes;(C)is a basinwide cooperative effort among the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Indian Tribes, and State management agencies; and(D)produces data used by State and Tribal fish management agencies to make management decisions regarding Great Lakes fisheries;(5)annually, Federal, State, and Tribal agencies stock approximately 21,000,000 hatchery-produced fish in the Great Lakes to support—(A)native species recovery; and(B)recreational and commercial fishing;(6)mass marking of hatchery-produced fish, using automated technology, is an efficient method of implementing a collaborative, science-based fishery program; and(7)the Great Lakes are an important and valued resource that—(A)supports a robust regional economy valued at more than $7,000,000,000; and(B)provides stability to the economy of the United States.3.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)DirectorThe term Director means the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.(2)ProgramThe term Program means the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program established by section 4(a).4.Great Lakes mass marking program(a)In generalTo assist in determining the effectiveness of hatchery operations and fisheries management actions and to support Great Lakes fisheries, there is established within the United States Fish and Wildlife Service a program for the mass marking of hatchery-produced fish in the Great Lakes basin, to be known as the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program.(b)Authorized actionsIn carrying out the Program, the Director may—(1)purchase capital and expendable equipment, fish tags, and other items necessary to support and carry out tagging and tag recovery operations, including data processing and data dissemination relating to those operations; and(2)hire additional personnel, as necessary.(c)Required collaborationIn carrying out the Program, the Director shall collaborate with applicable Federal, State, and Tribal fish management agencies, the Council of Lake Committees of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, and signatories to the Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries.(d)Availability of dataThe Director shall make the data collected under the Program available to applicable Federal, State, and Tribal fish management agencies—(1)to increase the understanding of the outcomes of management action;(2)to assist in meeting the restoration objectives of the Great Lakes, including the fish community objectives and fish management plans described in the Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries;(3)to assist in balancing predators and prey;(4)to support and improve the economic status of Tribal, recreational, and commercial fisheries; and(5)to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of habitat restoration efforts in the Great Lakes.5.Authorization of appropriationsThere is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the Program $2,700,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030.July 21, 2025Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

The bill's own words, from our database (synced from the GPO BILLS XML); paragraph breaks added at the bill's section boundaries, nothing else changed.

All Actions (20)

DateChamberAll Actions
03/06/2025Library of CongressIntroduced in House
03/06/2025Library of CongressIntroduced in House
03/06/2025House floor actionsReferred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
03/18/2025House committee actionsReferred to the Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries.
03/25/2025House committee actionsSubcommittee Hearings Held
06/25/2025House committee actionsSubcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries Discharged
06/25/2025House committee actionsCommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
06/25/2025House committee actionsOrdered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.
07/21/2025Library of CongressReported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-210.
07/21/2025House floor actionsReported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-210.
07/21/2025House floor actionsPlaced on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 171.
07/22/2025House floor actionsMr. Tiffany moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
07/22/2025House floor actionsConsidered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3543-3544)
07/22/2025House floor actionsDEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1917.
07/22/2025House floor actionsAt the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
07/22/2025House floor actionsConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3545)
07/22/2025Library of CongressPassed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 360 - 57 (Roll no. 216). (text: CR H3543)
07/22/2025House floor actionsOn motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 360 - 57 (Roll no. 216). (text: CR H3543)
07/22/2025House floor actionsMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
07/23/2025SenateReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Titles (7)

Title TypeTitle
Display TitleGreat Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025
Official Titles from EH (Engrossed in House) bill textTo establish the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program, and for other purposes.
Short Titles from RFS (Referred to Senate) bill textGreat Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025
Short Title(s) as Passed HouseGreat Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025
Official Title as IntroducedTo establish the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program, and for other purposes.
Short Title(s) as Reported to HouseGreat Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025
Short Title(s) as IntroducedGreat Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025

Amendments (0)

There are no amendments to this bill.

Cosponsors (6)

* = Original cosponsor

Committees (5)

CommitteeActivity
Senate - Environment and Public Works Committee07/23/2025 Referred To
House - Natural Resources Committee07/21/2025 Reported By
House - Natural Resources Committee06/25/2025 Markup By
House - Natural Resources Committee06/25/2025 Discharged from
House - Natural Resources Committee03/06/2025 Referred To

Related Bills (1)

Subjects (6)

Policy Area: Environmental Protection

All data on this page comes from our own database (legislation.congress_* tables), synced daily from the GPO govinfo BILLSTATUS and BILLS collections. Formatted after congress.gov; nothing is generated. Member placement is their DW-NOMINATE score (voteview.com, Lewis et al.) - a measurement of roll-call voting behavior, not our judgement. Buckets: Left below −0.50 · Lean Left to −0.25 · Center to +0.25 · Lean Right to +0.50 · Right above +0.50. The bill's Support meter aggregates the people who signed the bill - sponsor and current cosponsors, each counted once - nothing else.