Congressional Legislation · bill 119hr4437 · built from our database

Only the right has signed this so far (Bill Ranking)

SMART Act of 2025

H.R. 4437 · 119th Congress (2025-2026)

H.R. 4437119TH CONGRESSINTRODUCED 07/16/2025REP. TIMMONSR-SC · SPONSORLeft: no (Sponsor Ranking)Lean left: no (Sponsor Ranking)Center: no (Sponsor Ranking)Lean right: no (Sponsor Ranking)Right: DW-NOMINATE +0.60 (Sponsor Ranking)RIGHT(SPONSOR RANKING)FINANCE AND FINANCIAL SECTOR

2 members · Left 0 · Center 1 · Right 1 (Bill Ranking)

SponsorRep. Timmons, William R. (R-SC) (Introduced 07/16/2025)
Sponsor Voting RecordRight · DW-NOMINATE +0.60 · measured from every roll-call vote this member has cast (voteview.com) (Sponsor Ranking)
Support
LLLCLRR

support across the spectrum: 2 members signed on (Bill Ranking) this bill: sponsor + current cosponsors, each once

CommitteesSenate - Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee; House - Financial Services Committee; House - Financial Services Committee; House - Financial Services Committee
Latest Action05/13/2026 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Roll Call VotesThere have been no roll call votes
Sourceview on congress.gov →
IntroducedPassed HousePassed SenateResolving DifferencesTo PresidentBecame Law

Summary (1)

Introduced in House (07/16/2025)

Supervisory Modifications for Appropriate Risk-based Testing Act of 2025 or the SMART Act of 2025

This bill limits the scope of certain examinations and combines oversight procedures for certain small depository institutions and credit unions.

Specifically, depository institutions and credit unions that are considered well-capitalized and well-managed (per their most recent examination) with assets of $6 billion or less must receive a limited-scope examination, as determined by the appropriate federal regulator, in the year following a full-scope examination. In addition, upon request by the depository institution or credit union, the regulator must combine separate compliance examinations (e.g., safety and soundness examinations and information technology examinations) and perform them at the same time.

The bill provides exceptions for recently acquired depository institutions and for depository institutions and credit unions subject to certain formal enforcement proceedings or orders.

Text (4)

Engrossed in House (EH)

119 HR 4437 EH: Supervisory Modifications for Appropriate Risk-based Testing Act of 2025 U.S. House of Representatives text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. IB 119th CONGRESS2d Session H. R. 4437

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AN ACT To reduce the regulatory burden on certain well managed and well capitalized financial institutions, and for other purposes.

1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Supervisory Modifications for Appropriate Risk-based Testing Act of 2025 or the SMART Act of 2025.

2.Examination relief for certain well managed and well capitalized financial institutions (a)Insured depository institutionsSection 10(d) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1820(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following: (11)Examination relief for certain well managed and well capitalized insured depository institutions (A)In generalThe following shall apply to a well managed and well capitalized insured depository institution with $6,000,000,000 or less in consolidated assets: (i)Alternating limited-scope examinationsAfter an insured depository institution receives a full-scope, on-site examination from the appropriate Federal banking agency, the next examination of the insured depository institution by the appropriate Federal banking agency shall be a limited-scope examination, as determined by the appropriate Federal banking agency. (ii)Combined examinationsIf an insured depository institution is otherwise subject to separate safety and soundness examinations, consumer compliance examinations, and information technology and cybersecurity examinations, the appropriate Federal banking agency shall, upon request of the insured depository institution, combine two or three such examinations, as specified by the insured depository institution, and carry them out at the same time. (B)ExceptionSubparagraph (A) shall not apply to an insured depository institution if— (i)the insured depository institution is currently subject to a formal enforcement proceeding or order by the Corporation or the appropriate Federal banking agency; or (ii)a person acquired control of the insured depository institution since the most recent full-scope, on-site examination of the insured depository institution from the appropriate Federal banking agency. (C)RulemakingNot later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this paragraph, the Federal banking agencies shall issue rules to carry out subparagraph (A), including, with respect to an insured depository institution described under subparagraph (A), to— (i)establish procedures for the limited-scope examinations described in subparagraph (A)(i); (ii)establish procedures for reviewing insured depository institutions that— (I)experience material changes in financial condition or operational risk profile between scheduled examinations; or (II)have failed to comply with Federal or State banking laws and regulations; and (iii)balance the goals of streamlining the examination cycle for individual insured depository institutions and reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens while maintaining sufficient oversight to ensure the continued safety and soundness of the insured depository institutions and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. (D)Rule of constructionNothing in this paragraph may be construed to limit the authority of a Federal banking agency to conduct off-site monitoring, targeted reviews, or additional full-scope, on-site examinations of an insured depository institution if the Federal banking agency determines such monitoring, reviews, or examinations are necessary to ensure safety and soundness or compliance with applicable laws. (E)DefinitionsIn this paragraph: (i)Consumer compliance examinationThe term consumer compliance examination means an examination to assess compliance with the requirements of Federal consumer financial law (as such term is defined in section 1002 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010). (ii)Well capitalizedThe term well capitalized has the meaning given that term in section 38(b). (iii)Well managedWith respect to an insured depository institution, the term well managed means that, when the institution was most recently examined by the appropriate Federal banking agency, the institution was found to be well managed, and the institution’s composite condition was found to be satisfactory or outstanding.. (b)Insured credit unionsSection 204 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1784) is amended by adding at the end the following: (h)Examination relief for certain well managed and well capitalized insured credit unions (1)In generalThe following shall apply to a well managed and well capitalized insured credit union with $6,000,000,000 or less in consolidated assets: (A)Alternating limited-scope examinationsAfter an insured credit union receives a full-scope, on-site examination from the National Credit Union Administration, the next examination of the insured credit union by the National Credit Union Administration shall be a limited-scope examination, as determined by the National Credit Union Administration. (B)Combined examinationsIf an insured credit union is otherwise subject to separate safety and soundness examinations, consumer compliance examinations, and information technology and cybersecurity examinations, the National Credit Union Administration shall, upon request of the insured credit union, combine two or three such examinations, as specified by the insured credit union, and carry them out at the same time. (2)ExceptionParagraph (1) shall not apply to an insured credit union if the insured credit union is currently subject to a formal enforcement proceeding or order by the National Credit Union Administration. (3)RulemakingNot later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this subsection, the National Credit Union Administration shall issue rules to carry out paragraph (1), including, with respect to an insured credit union described under paragraph (1), to— (A)establish procedures for the limited-scope examinations described in paragraph (1)(A); (B)establish procedures for reviewing insured credit unions that— (i)experience material changes in financial condition or operational risk profile between scheduled examinations; or (ii)have failed to comply with Federal or State banking laws and regulations; and (C)balance the goals of streamlining the examination cycle for individual insured credit unions and reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens while maintaining sufficient oversight to ensure the continued safety and soundness of the insured credit unions and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. (4)Rule of constructionNothing in this subsection may be construed to limit the authority of the National Credit Union Administration to conduct off-site monitoring, targeted reviews, or additional full-scope, on-site examinations of an insured credit union if the National Credit Union Administration determines such monitoring, reviews, or examinations are necessary to ensure safety and soundness or compliance with applicable laws. (5)DefinitionsIn this paragraph: (A)Consumer compliance examinationThe term consumer compliance examination means an examination to assess compliance with the requirements of Federal consumer financial law (as such term is defined in section 1002 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010). (B)Well capitalizedThe term well capitalized has the meaning given that term in section 216(c). (C)Well managedWith respect to an insured credit union, the term well managed means that, when the credit union was most recently examined by the National Credit Union Administration, the credit union was found to be well managed, and the credit union’s composite condition was found to be satisfactory or outstanding..

3.Examination practices (a)Insured depository institutionsSection 10(d) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1820(d)), as amended by section 2(a), is further amended by adding at the end the following: (12)Examination practicesWith respect to on-site examination of an insured depository institution with less than $6,000,000,000 in total assets, the appropriate Federal banking agency shall— (A)ensure the examination is led by, to the maximum extent practicable, an examiner with significant experience as an examiner; (B)make every effort, to the maximum extent practicable, to minimize the number of examiners utilized and the amount of time spent at the institution to carry out the examination; (C)make every effort, to the maximum extent practicable, to schedule the examination at a time that is convenient for the institution; and (D)to the maximum extent practicable, give the institution advance notice of issues expected to be covered in the examination. (13)ReportIn its annual report to Congress, each Federal banking agency shall include— (A)information on how the agency is complying with paragraphs (11) and (12); and (B)aggregate data summarizing the agency’s examination practices with respect to insured depository institutions with less than $6,000,000,000 in total assets, including— (i)the average experience of examiners, including the average number of years of examiner experience of those who lead on-site examinations; (ii)the average number of examiners utilized; and (iii)the average amount of time the agency spends visiting such institutions for on-site examinations.. (b)Insured credit unionsSection 204 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1784), as amended by section 2(b), is further amended by adding at the end the following: (i)Examination practicesWith respect to on-site examination of an insured credit union with less than $6,000,000,000 in total assets, the National Credit Union Administration shall— (1)ensure the examination is led by, to the maximum extent practicable, an examiner with significant experience as an examiner; (2)make every effort, to the maximum extent practicable, to minimize the number of examiners utilized and the amount of time spent at the credit union to carry out the examination; (3)make every effort, to the maximum extent practicable, to schedule the examination at a time that is convenient for the credit union; and (4)to the maximum extent practicable, give the credit union advance notice of issues expected to be covered in the examination. (j)ReportIn its annual report to Congress, the National Credit Union Administration shall include— (1)information on how the Administration is complying with subsections (h) and (i); and (2)aggregate data summarizing the Administration’s examination practices with respect to insured credit unions with less than $6,000,000,000 in total assets, including— (A)the average experience of examiners, including the average number of years of examiner experience of those who lead on-site examinations; (B)the average number of examiners utilized; and (C)the average amount of time the Administration spends visiting such credit unions for on-site examinations.. Passed the House of Representatives May 12, 2026.Kevin F. McCumber,Clerk.

Introduced in House (IH)

119 HR 4437 IH: Supervisory Modifications for Appropriate Risk-based Testing Act of 2025 U.S. House of Representatives 2025-07-16 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I119th CONGRESS1st SessionH. R. 4437IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESJuly 16, 2025Mr. Timmons (for himself and Mr. Foster) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial ServicesA BILLTo reduce the regulatory burden on certain well managed and well capitalized financial institutions, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Supervisory Modifications for Appropriate Risk-based Testing Act of 2025 or the SMART Act of 2025.2.Examination relief for certain well managed and well capitalized financial institutions(a)Insured depository institutionsSection 10(d) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1820(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following:(11)Examination relief for certain well managed and well capitalized insured depository institutions(A)In generalThe following shall apply to a well managed and well capitalized insured depository institution with $6,000,000,000 or less in consolidated assets:(i)Alternating limited-scope examinationsAfter an insured depository institution receives a full-scope, on-site examination from the appropriate Federal banking agency, the next examination of the insured depository institution by the appropriate Federal banking agency shall be a limited-scope examination, as determined by the appropriate Federal banking agency.(ii)Combined examinationsIf an insured depository institution is otherwise subject to separate safety and soundness examinations, consumer compliance examinations, and information technology and cybersecurity examinations, the appropriate Federal banking agency shall, upon request of the insured depository institution, combine two or three such examinations, as specified by the insured depository institution, and carry them out at the same time.(B)ExceptionSubparagraph (A) shall not apply to an insured depository institution if—(i)the insured depository institution is currently subject to a formal enforcement proceeding or order by the Corporation or the appropriate Federal banking agency; or(ii)a person acquired control of the insured depository institution since the most recent full-scope, on-site examination of the insured depository institution from the appropriate Federal banking agency.(C)RulemakingNot later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this paragraph, the Federal banking agencies shall issue rules to carry out subparagraph (A), including, with respect to an insured depository institution described under subparagraph (A), to—(i)establish procedures for the limited-scope examinations described in subparagraph (A)(i);(ii)establish procedures for reviewing insured depository institutions that—(I)experience material changes in financial condition or operational risk profile between scheduled examinations; or(II)have failed to comply with Federal or State banking laws and regulations; and(iii)balance the goals of streamlining the examination cycle for individual insured depository institutions and reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens while maintaining sufficient oversight to ensure the continued safety and soundness of the insured depository institutions and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.(D)Rule of constructionNothing in this paragraph may be construed to limit the authority of a Federal banking agency to conduct off-site monitoring, targeted reviews, or additional full-scope, on-site examinations of an insured depository institution if the Federal banking agency determines such monitoring, reviews, or examinations are necessary to ensure safety and soundness or compliance with applicable laws.(E)DefinitionsIn this paragraph:(i)Consumer compliance examinationThe term consumer compliance examination means an examination to assess compliance with the requirements of Federal consumer financial law (as such term is defined in section 1002 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010).(ii)Well capitalizedThe term well capitalized has the meaning given that term in section 38(b).(iii)Well managedWith respect to an insured depository institution, the term well managed means that, when the institution was most recently examined by the appropriate Federal banking agency, the institution was found to be well managed, and the institution’s composite condition was found to be satisfactory or outstanding..(b)Insured credit unionsSection 204 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1784) is amended by adding at the end the following:(h)Examination relief for certain well managed and well capitalized insured credit unions(1)In generalThe following shall apply to a well managed and well capitalized insured credit union with $6,000,000,000 or less in consolidated assets:(A)Alternating limited-scope examinationsAfter an insured credit union receives a full-scope, on-site examination from the National Credit Union Administration, the next examination of the insured credit union by the National Credit Union Administration shall be a limited-scope examination, as determined by the National Credit Union Administration.(B)Combined examinationsIf an insured credit union is otherwise subject to separate safety and soundness examinations, consumer compliance examinations, and information technology and cybersecurity examinations, the National Credit Union Administration shall, upon request of the insured credit union, combine two or three such examinations, as specified by the insured credit union, and carry them out at the same time.(2)ExceptionParagraph (1) shall not apply to an insured credit union if the insured credit union is currently subject to a formal enforcement proceeding or order by the National Credit Union Administration.(3)RulemakingNot later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this subsection, the National Credit Union Administration shall issue rules to carry out paragraph (1), including, with respect to an insured credit union described under paragraph (1), to—(A)establish procedures for the limited-scope examinations described in paragraph (1)(A);(B)establish procedures for reviewing insured credit unions that—(i)experience material changes in financial condition or operational risk profile between scheduled examinations; or(ii)have failed to comply with Federal or State banking laws and regulations; and(C)balance the goals of streamlining the examination cycle for individual insured credit unions and reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens while maintaining sufficient oversight to ensure the continued safety and soundness of the insured credit unions and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.(4)Rule of constructionNothing in this subsection may be construed to limit the authority of the National Credit Union Administration to conduct off-site monitoring, targeted reviews, or additional full-scope, on-site examinations of an insured credit union if the National Credit Union Administration determines such monitoring, reviews, or examinations are necessary to ensure safety and soundness or compliance with applicable laws.(5)DefinitionsIn this paragraph:(A)Consumer compliance examinationThe term consumer compliance examination means an examination to assess compliance with the requirements of Federal consumer financial law (as such term is defined in section 1002 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010).(B)Well capitalizedThe term well capitalized has the meaning given that term in section 216(c).(C)Well managedWith respect to an insured credit union, the term well managed means that, when the credit union was most recently examined by the National Credit Union Administration, the credit union was found to be well managed, and the credit union’s composite condition was found to be satisfactory or outstanding..

Referred in Senate (RFS)

119 HR 4437 : Supervisory Modifications for Appropriate Risk-based Testing Act of 2025 U.S. House of Representatives 2026-05-13 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. IIB119th CONGRESS2d SessionH. R. 4437IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESMay 13, 2026Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban AffairsAN ACTTo reduce the regulatory burden on certain well managed and well capitalized financial institutions, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Supervisory Modifications for Appropriate Risk-based Testing Act of 2025 or the SMART Act of 2025.2.Examination relief for certain well managed and well capitalized financial institutions(a)Insured depository institutionsSection 10(d) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1820(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following:(11)Examination relief for certain well managed and well capitalized insured depository institutions(A)In generalThe following shall apply to a well managed and well capitalized insured depository institution with $6,000,000,000 or less in consolidated assets:(i)Alternating limited-scope examinationsAfter an insured depository institution receives a full-scope, on-site examination from the appropriate Federal banking agency, the next examination of the insured depository institution by the appropriate Federal banking agency shall be a limited-scope examination, as determined by the appropriate Federal banking agency.(ii)Combined examinationsIf an insured depository institution is otherwise subject to separate safety and soundness examinations, consumer compliance examinations, and information technology and cybersecurity examinations, the appropriate Federal banking agency shall, upon request of the insured depository institution, combine two or three such examinations, as specified by the insured depository institution, and carry them out at the same time.(B)ExceptionSubparagraph (A) shall not apply to an insured depository institution if—(i)the insured depository institution is currently subject to a formal enforcement proceeding or order by the Corporation or the appropriate Federal banking agency; or(ii)a person acquired control of the insured depository institution since the most recent full-scope, on-site examination of the insured depository institution from the appropriate Federal banking agency.(C)RulemakingNot later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this paragraph, the Federal banking agencies shall issue rules to carry out subparagraph (A), including, with respect to an insured depository institution described under subparagraph (A), to—(i)establish procedures for the limited-scope examinations described in subparagraph (A)(i);(ii)establish procedures for reviewing insured depository institutions that—(I)experience material changes in financial condition or operational risk profile between scheduled examinations; or(II)have failed to comply with Federal or State banking laws and regulations; and(iii)balance the goals of streamlining the examination cycle for individual insured depository institutions and reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens while maintaining sufficient oversight to ensure the continued safety and soundness of the insured depository institutions and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.(D)Rule of constructionNothing in this paragraph may be construed to limit the authority of a Federal banking agency to conduct off-site monitoring, targeted reviews, or additional full-scope, on-site examinations of an insured depository institution if the Federal banking agency determines such monitoring, reviews, or examinations are necessary to ensure safety and soundness or compliance with applicable laws.(E)DefinitionsIn this paragraph:(i)Consumer compliance examinationThe term consumer compliance examination means an examination to assess compliance with the requirements of Federal consumer financial law (as such term is defined in section 1002 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010).(ii)Well capitalizedThe term well capitalized has the meaning given that term in section 38(b).(iii)Well managedWith respect to an insured depository institution, the term well managed means that, when the institution was most recently examined by the appropriate Federal banking agency, the institution was found to be well managed, and the institution’s composite condition was found to be satisfactory or outstanding..(b)Insured credit unionsSection 204 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1784) is amended by adding at the end the following:(h)Examination relief for certain well managed and well capitalized insured credit unions(1)In generalThe following shall apply to a well managed and well capitalized insured credit union with $6,000,000,000 or less in consolidated assets:(A)Alternating limited-scope examinationsAfter an insured credit union receives a full-scope, on-site examination from the National Credit Union Administration, the next examination of the insured credit union by the National Credit Union Administration shall be a limited-scope examination, as determined by the National Credit Union Administration.(B)Combined examinationsIf an insured credit union is otherwise subject to separate safety and soundness examinations, consumer compliance examinations, and information technology and cybersecurity examinations, the National Credit Union Administration shall, upon request of the insured credit union, combine two or three such examinations, as specified by the insured credit union, and carry them out at the same time.(2)ExceptionParagraph (1) shall not apply to an insured credit union if the insured credit union is currently subject to a formal enforcement proceeding or order by the National Credit Union Administration.(3)RulemakingNot later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this subsection, the National Credit Union Administration shall issue rules to carry out paragraph (1), including, with respect to an insured credit union described under paragraph (1), to—(A)establish procedures for the limited-scope examinations described in paragraph (1)(A);(B)establish procedures for reviewing insured credit unions that—(i)experience material changes in financial condition or operational risk profile between scheduled examinations; or(ii)have failed to comply with Federal or State banking laws and regulations; and(C)balance the goals of streamlining the examination cycle for individual insured credit unions and reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens while maintaining sufficient oversight to ensure the continued safety and soundness of the insured credit unions and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.(4)Rule of constructionNothing in this subsection may be construed to limit the authority of the National Credit Union Administration to conduct off-site monitoring, targeted reviews, or additional full-scope, on-site examinations of an insured credit union if the National Credit Union Administration determines such monitoring, reviews, or examinations are necessary to ensure safety and soundness or compliance with applicable laws.(5)DefinitionsIn this paragraph:(A)Consumer compliance examinationThe term consumer compliance examination means an examination to assess compliance with the requirements of Federal consumer financial law (as such term is defined in section 1002 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010).(B)Well capitalizedThe term well capitalized has the meaning given that term in section 216(c).(C)Well managedWith respect to an insured credit union, the term well managed means that, when the credit union was most recently examined by the National Credit Union Administration, the credit union was found to be well managed, and the credit union’s composite condition was found to be satisfactory or outstanding..3.Examination practices(a)Insured depository institutionsSection 10(d) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1820(d)), as amended by section 2(a), is further amended by adding at the end the following:(12)Examination practicesWith respect to on-site examination of an insured depository institution with less than $6,000,000,000 in total assets, the appropriate Federal banking agency shall—(A)ensure the examination is led by, to the maximum extent practicable, an examiner with significant experience as an examiner;(B)make every effort, to the maximum extent practicable, to minimize the number of examiners utilized and the amount of time spent at the institution to carry out the examination;(C)make every effort, to the maximum extent practicable, to schedule the examination at a time that is convenient for the institution; and(D)to the maximum extent practicable, give the institution advance notice of issues expected to be covered in the examination.(13)ReportIn its annual report to Congress, each Federal banking agency shall include—(A)information on how the agency is complying with paragraphs (11) and (12); and(B)aggregate data summarizing the agency’s examination practices with respect to insured depository institutions with less than $6,000,000,000 in total assets, including—(i)the average experience of examiners, including the average number of years of examiner experience of those who lead on-site examinations;(ii)the average number of examiners utilized; and(iii)the average amount of time the agency spends visiting such institutions for on-site examinations..(b)Insured credit unionsSection 204 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1784), as amended by section 2(b), is further amended by adding at the end the following:(i)Examination practicesWith respect to on-site examination of an insured credit union with less than $6,000,000,000 in total assets, the National Credit Union Administration shall—(1)ensure the examination is led by, to the maximum extent practicable, an examiner with significant experience as an examiner;(2)make every effort, to the maximum extent practicable, to minimize the number of examiners utilized and the amount of time spent at the credit union to carry out the examination;(3)make every effort, to the maximum extent practicable, to schedule the examination at a time that is convenient for the credit union; and(4)to the maximum extent practicable, give the credit union advance notice of issues expected to be covered in the examination.(j)ReportIn its annual report to Congress, the National Credit Union Administration shall include—(1)information on how the Administration is complying with subsections (h) and (i); and(2)aggregate data summarizing the Administration’s examination practices with respect to insured credit unions with less than $6,000,000,000 in total assets, including—(A)the average experience of examiners, including the average number of years of examiner experience of those who lead on-site examinations;(B)the average number of examiners utilized; and(C)the average amount of time the Administration spends visiting such credit unions for on-site examinations..Passed the House of Representatives May 12, 2026.Kevin F. McCumber,Clerk.

Reported in House (RH)

119 HR 4437 RH: Supervisory Modifications for Appropriate Risk-based Testing Act of 2025 U.S. House of Representatives 2025-09-08 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. IBUnion Calendar No. 206119th CONGRESS1st SessionH. R. 4437[Report No. 119–249]IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESJuly 16, 2025Mr. Timmons (for himself and Mr. Foster) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial ServicesSeptember 8, 2025Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printedStrike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italicFor text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on July 16, 2025A BILLTo reduce the regulatory burden on certain well managed and well capitalized financial institutions, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Supervisory Modifications for Appropriate Risk-based Testing Act of 2025 or the SMART Act of 2025.2.Examination relief for certain well managed and well capitalized financial institutions(a)Insured depository institutionsSection 10(d) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1820(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following:(11)Examination relief for certain well managed and well capitalized insured depository institutions(A)In generalThe following shall apply to a well managed and well capitalized insured depository institution with $6,000,000,000 or less in consolidated assets:(i)Alternating limited-scope examinationsAfter an insured depository institution receives a full-scope, on-site examination from the appropriate Federal banking agency, the next examination of the insured depository institution by the appropriate Federal banking agency shall be a limited-scope examination, as determined by the appropriate Federal banking agency.(ii)Combined examinationsIf an insured depository institution is otherwise subject to separate safety and soundness examinations, consumer compliance examinations, and information technology and cybersecurity examinations, the appropriate Federal banking agency shall, upon request of the insured depository institution, combine two or three such examinations, as specified by the insured depository institution, and carry them out at the same time.(B)ExceptionSubparagraph (A) shall not apply to an insured depository institution if—(i)the insured depository institution is currently subject to a formal enforcement proceeding or order by the Corporation or the appropriate Federal banking agency; or(ii)a person acquired control of the insured depository institution since the most recent full-scope, on-site examination of the insured depository institution from the appropriate Federal banking agency.(C)RulemakingNot later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this paragraph, the Federal banking agencies shall issue rules to carry out subparagraph (A), including, with respect to an insured depository institution described under subparagraph (A), to—(i)establish procedures for the limited-scope examinations described in subparagraph (A)(i);(ii)establish procedures for reviewing insured depository institutions that—(I)experience material changes in financial condition or operational risk profile between scheduled examinations; or(II)have failed to comply with Federal or State banking laws and regulations; and(iii)balance the goals of streamlining the examination cycle for individual insured depository institutions and reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens while maintaining sufficient oversight to ensure the continued safety and soundness of the insured depository institutions and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.(D)Rule of constructionNothing in this paragraph may be construed to limit the authority of a Federal banking agency to conduct off-site monitoring, targeted reviews, or additional full-scope, on-site examinations of an insured depository institution if the Federal banking agency determines such monitoring, reviews, or examinations are necessary to ensure safety and soundness or compliance with applicable laws.(E)DefinitionsIn this paragraph:(i)Consumer compliance examinationThe term consumer compliance examination means an examination to assess compliance with the requirements of Federal consumer financial law (as such term is defined in section 1002 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010).(ii)Well capitalizedThe term well capitalized has the meaning given that term in section 38(b).(iii)Well managedWith respect to an insured depository institution, the term well managed means that, when the institution was most recently examined by the appropriate Federal banking agency, the institution was found to be well managed, and the institution’s composite condition was found to be satisfactory or outstanding..(b)Insured credit unionsSection 204 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1784) is amended by adding at the end the following:(h)Examination relief for certain well managed and well capitalized insured credit unions(1)In generalThe following shall apply to a well managed and well capitalized insured credit union with $6,000,000,000 or less in consolidated assets:(A)Alternating limited-scope examinationsAfter an insured credit union receives a full-scope, on-site examination from the National Credit Union Administration, the next examination of the insured credit union by the National Credit Union Administration shall be a limited-scope examination, as determined by the National Credit Union Administration.(B)Combined examinationsIf an insured credit union is otherwise subject to separate safety and soundness examinations, consumer compliance examinations, and information technology and cybersecurity examinations, the National Credit Union Administration shall, upon request of the insured credit union, combine two or three such examinations, as specified by the insured credit union, and carry them out at the same time.(2)ExceptionParagraph (1) shall not apply to an insured credit union if the insured credit union is currently subject to a formal enforcement proceeding or order by the National Credit Union Administration.(3)RulemakingNot later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this subsection, the National Credit Union Administration shall issue rules to carry out paragraph (1), including, with respect to an insured credit union described under paragraph (1), to—(A)establish procedures for the limited-scope examinations described in paragraph (1)(A);(B)establish procedures for reviewing insured credit unions that—(i)experience material changes in financial condition or operational risk profile between scheduled examinations; or(ii)have failed to comply with Federal or State banking laws and regulations; and(C)balance the goals of streamlining the examination cycle for individual insured credit unions and reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens while maintaining sufficient oversight to ensure the continued safety and soundness of the insured credit unions and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.(4)Rule of constructionNothing in this subsection may be construed to limit the authority of the National Credit Union Administration to conduct off-site monitoring, targeted reviews, or additional full-scope, on-site examinations of an insured credit union if the National Credit Union Administration determines such monitoring, reviews, or examinations are necessary to ensure safety and soundness or compliance with applicable laws.(5)DefinitionsIn this paragraph:(A)Consumer compliance examinationThe term consumer compliance examination means an examination to assess compliance with the requirements of Federal consumer financial law (as such term is defined in section 1002 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010).(B)Well capitalizedThe term well capitalized has the meaning given that term in section 216(c).(C)Well managedWith respect to an insured credit union, the term well managed means that, when the credit union was most recently examined by the National Credit Union Administration, the credit union was found to be well managed, and the credit union’s composite condition was found to be satisfactory or outstanding..3.Examination practices(a)Insured depository institutionsSection 10(d) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1820(d)), as amended by section 2(a), is further amended by adding at the end the following:(12)Examination practicesWith respect to on-site examination of an insured depository institution with less than $6,000,000,000 in total assets, the appropriate Federal banking agency shall—(A)ensure the examination is led by, to the maximum extent practicable, an examiner with significant experience as an examiner;(B)make every effort, to the maximum extent practicable, to minimize the number of examiners utilized and the amount of time spent at the institution to carry out the examination;(C)make every effort, to the maximum extent practicable, to schedule the examination at a time that is convenient for the institution; and(D)to the maximum extent practicable, give the institution advance notice of issues expected to be covered in the examination.(13)ReportIn its annual report to Congress, each Federal banking agency shall include—(A)information on how the agency is complying with paragraphs (11) and (12); and(B)aggregate data summarizing the agency’s examination practices with respect to insured depository institutions with less than $6,000,000,000 in total assets, including—(i)the average experience of examiners, including the average number of years of examiner experience of those who lead on-site examinations;(ii)the average number of examiners utilized; and(iii)the average amount of time the agency spends visiting such institutions for on-site examinations..(b)Insured credit unionsSection 204 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1784), as amended by section 2(b), is further amended by adding at the end the following:(i)Examination practicesWith respect to on-site examination of an insured credit union with less than $6,000,000,000 in total assets, the National Credit Union Administration shall—(1)ensure the examination is led by, to the maximum extent practicable, an examiner with significant experience as an examiner;(2)make every effort, to the maximum extent practicable, to minimize the number of examiners utilized and the amount of time spent at the credit union to carry out the examination;(3)make every effort, to the maximum extent practicable, to schedule the examination at a time that is convenient for the credit union; and(4)to the maximum extent practicable, give the credit union advance notice of issues expected to be covered in the examination.(j)ReportIn its annual report to Congress, the National Credit Union Administration shall include—(1)information on how the Administration is complying with subsections (h) and (i); and(2)aggregate data summarizing the Administration’s examination practices with respect to insured credit unions with less than $6,000,000,000 in total assets, including—(A)the average experience of examiners, including the average number of years of examiner experience of those who lead on-site examinations;(B)the average number of examiners utilized; and(C)the average amount of time the Administration spends visiting such credit unions for on-site examinations..September 8, 2025Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

The bill's own words, from our database (synced from the GPO BILLS XML); paragraph breaks added at the bill's section boundaries, nothing else changed.

All Actions (15)

DateChamberAll Actions
07/16/2025Library of CongressIntroduced in House
07/16/2025Library of CongressIntroduced in House
07/16/2025House floor actionsReferred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
07/22/2025House committee actionsCommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
07/22/2025House committee actionsOrdered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 53 - 1.
09/08/2025Library of CongressReported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-249.
09/08/2025House floor actionsReported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-249.
09/08/2025House floor actionsPlaced on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 206.
05/12/2026House floor actionsMr. Hill (AR) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
05/12/2026House floor actionsConsidered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3353-3356)
05/12/2026House floor actionsDEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 4437.
05/12/2026Library of CongressPassed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3353-3354)
05/12/2026House floor actionsOn motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3353-3354)
05/12/2026House floor actionsMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
05/13/2026SenateReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Titles (11)

Title TypeTitle
Display TitleSMART Act of 2025
Short Titles from RFS (Referred to Senate) bill textSMART Act of 2025
Short Titles from RFS (Referred to Senate) bill textSupervisory Modifications for Appropriate Risk-based Testing Act of 2025
Short Title(s) as Passed HouseSupervisory Modifications for Appropriate Risk-based Testing Act of 2025
Official Titles from EH (Engrossed in House) bill textTo reduce the regulatory burden on certain well managed and well capitalized financial institutions, and for other purposes.
Short Title(s) as Passed HouseSMART Act of 2025
Short Title(s) as Reported to HouseSMART Act of 2025
Short Title(s) as Reported to HouseSupervisory Modifications for Appropriate Risk-based Testing Act of 2025
Short Title(s) as IntroducedSupervisory Modifications for Appropriate Risk-based Testing Act of 2025
Short Title(s) as IntroducedSMART Act of 2025
Official Title as IntroducedTo reduce the regulatory burden on certain well managed and well capitalized financial institutions, and for other purposes.

Amendments (0)

There are no amendments to this bill.

Cosponsors (1)

* = Original cosponsor

Committees (4)

CommitteeActivity
Senate - Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee05/13/2026 Referred To
House - Financial Services Committee09/08/2025 Reported By
House - Financial Services Committee07/22/2025 Markup By
House - Financial Services Committee07/16/2025 Referred To

Related Bills (1)

Subjects (6)

Policy Area: Finance and Financial Sector

All data on this page comes from our own database (legislation.congress_* tables), synced daily from the GPO govinfo BILLSTATUS and BILLS collections. Formatted after congress.gov; nothing is generated. Member placement is their DW-NOMINATE score (voteview.com, Lewis et al.) - a measurement of roll-call voting behavior, not our judgement. Buckets: Left below −0.50 · Lean Left to −0.25 · Center to +0.25 · Lean Right to +0.50 · Right above +0.50. The bill's Support meter aggregates the people who signed the bill - sponsor and current cosponsors, each counted once - nothing else.