Only the right has signed this so far (Bill Ranking)
H.R. 7726 · 119th Congress (2025-2026)
1 member · Left 0 · Center 0 · Right 1 (Bill Ranking)
| Sponsor | Rep. Miller, Mary E. (R-IL) (Introduced 02/26/2026) |
|---|---|
| Sponsor Voting Record | Right · DW-NOMINATE +0.79 · measured from every roll-call vote this member has cast (voteview.com) (Sponsor Ranking) |
| Support |
LLLCLRR support across the spectrum: 1 member signed on (Bill Ranking) this bill: sponsor + current cosponsors, each once |
| Committees | Senate - Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee; House - Education and Workforce Committee; House - Education and Workforce Committee; House - Education and Workforce Committee; House - Education and Workforce Committee; House - Education and Workforce Committee |
| Latest Action | 06/04/2026 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. |
| Roll Call Votes | 2 |
| Source | view on congress.gov → |
Reported to House (04/06/2026)
No Funds for Repeat Child Care Violations Act of 2026
This bill subjects states to additional sanctions for improperly using funds under the Child Care and Development Block Grant program. The program provides grants to states to support child care programs for low-income working families.
Specifically, if the Office of the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) finds that a state has failed to comply substantially with the requirements of the program, the ACF must impose additional sanctions, which include disqualifying the state from receiving funds under the program.
Under current law, the ACF is permitted, but not required, to take such actions for a state's noncompliance.
119 HR 7726 EH: Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026 U.S. House of Representatives text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7726
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AN ACT To amend the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 to withhold funds from noncompliant States under such Act.
1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026.
2.Strengthening the authority to withhold funds for fraudSection 658I(b)(2)(B) of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858g(b)(2)) is amended by striking Secretary may and inserting Secretary shall.
3.Program integrity and accountabilitySection 658E(c)(2) of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858c(c)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following: (W)program integrity and accountabilityThe plan shall include a description of— (i)the State's internal controls to ensure program integrity and accountability; (ii)the processes in place— (I)to investigate and recover fraudulent payments; and (II)to impose sanctions on clients or providers in response to fraud; and (iii)the procedures in place to document and verify eligibility.Such description shall include how the State utilizes data within and across other State and local agencies that have oversight of child care providers that serve children who receive assistance under this subchapter..
4.Preventing fraud in the child care and development block grant programSection 658I(b) of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858g(b)) is amended— (1)by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and (2)by inserting after paragraph (2) the following: (3)Determination of fraud (A)InvestigationThe Secretary shall investigate fraud with respect to financial assistance available under this subchapter. (B)DebarmentIn the case that the Secretary makes, or finds that there has been, a final determination of fraud against a child care provider that received financial assistance available under this subchapter, the Secretary shall permanently debar such child care provider from receiving such financial assistance. (C)Providers debarred from Child and Adult Care Food ProgramIn the case that a child care provider has been debarred from participating in the Child and Adult Care Food Program under section 17 of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1766) in accordance with subsection (d)(5)(E)(i) of such section, the Secretary shall permanently debar such child care provider from receiving financial assistance under this subchapter. (D)Final determination of fraud definitionIn this paragraph, the term final determination of fraud means a determination reached in an administrative order or as part of a judicial decision, for which any rights to review or appeal have been exhausted or waived, that a child care provider— (i)knowingly submitted a false statement or documentation to obtain financial assistance available under this subchapter; (ii)misrepresented ownership of, enrollment at, attendance at, or services provided through a program of child care services, or the eligibility of the provider to provide such services, to obtain such financial assistance; (iii)to obtain such financial assistance, operated without the State licensing described in section 658E(c)(2)(F) and without receiving an exception to such licensing; (iv)made a knowing and improper expenditure of such financial assistance; or (v)engaged in any other conduct related to such financial assistance that constituted fraud under Federal or State law..
5.Improper payment rate requiring corrective action plan; conditional ineligibilitySection 658J of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858h) is amended— (1)by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (e); and (2)by inserting after subsection (b) the following: (c)improper payment threshold requiring corrective action planIf for a fiscal year the improper payment rate of a State is more than 5 percent of the aggregate amount of payments made to carry out this subchapter by such State for such fiscal year, then such State shall submit to the Secretary— (1)for review and approval a corrective action plan to reduce such rate to not more than 5 percent for each subsequent fiscal year; and (2)such reports as the Secretary may require to show that such State is complying with the requirements of such plan as approved by the Secretary. (d)Conditional ineligibilityIf for each of 2 consecutive fiscal years the improper payment rate of a State determined under this section is more 5 percent, then such State shall be ineligible to receive funds under this subchapter unless such State demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Secretary that such State for the next fiscal year will— (1)reduce such improper payment rate to not more than 5 percent for the next fiscal year; or (2)make significant progress to comply with the corrective action plan approved under subsection (c)..
6.Cyclical monitoring of State performanceSection 658K of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858i) is amended by adding at the end the following: (c)Periodic monitoring by the SecretaryAt 3-year intervals, the Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive review of the performance of each State that receives assistance under this subchapter. Based on the results of such review, the Secretary shall designate as high risk a State that has— (1)a high level of unresolved or repeated adverse audit findings submitted under subsection (b); (2)a high level of unresolved issues under, or repeated performance failures to carry out, corrective action plans submitted by such State under section 659J(c); or (3)unresolved or repeat findings of noncompliance with the State plan approved under section 658E(c). (d)Required additional monitoringIf a State is designated as high risk under subsection (a), then the performance of such State shall be subject to additional monitoring, as determined by the Secretary..
7.Preventing fraud in the child and adult care food programSection 17(d)(5) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1766(d)(5)) is amended— (1)by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (F); and (2)by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following: (E)Termination due to fraud (i)DebarmentIn the case that the participation of an institution or family or group day care home under the program is terminated due to a final determination of fraud, the Secretary shall permanently debar such institution or family or group day care home from participating in the program. (ii)Providers debarred from Child Care and Development Block Grant programIn the case that an institution or family or group day care home has been debarred from receiving financial assistance under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9857 et seq.) in accordance with section 658I(b)(3)(B) of such Act, the Secretary shall permanently debar such institution or family or group day care home from participating in the program. (iii)Final determination of fraud definitionIn this subparagraph, the term final determination of fraud means a determination reached in accordance with the procedures and requirements of this section, for which any rights to review or appeal have been exhausted or waived, that an institution or family or group day care home— (I)knowingly submitted a false statement or documentation to obtain funds disbursed under subsection (f)(1)(A); (II)misrepresented ownership, enrollment, attendance, or services in connection with the operation of the program by such institution or family or group day care home, or the eligibility of such institution or family or group day care home to operate the program, to obtain such funds; (III)made a knowing and improper expenditure of such funds; or (IV)engaged in any other conduct related to such funds that constituted fraud under Federal or State law..
8.Eliminating authority to waive sanctionsSection 658I(c) of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858lg(c)) is amended— (1)in paragraph (1) by striking or sanctions imposed upon a State in accordance with subsection (b)(2); (2)in paragraph (2)— (A)in subparagraph (A) by striking sanction or; and (B)in subparagraph (B) by striking sanction or; (3)in paragraph (3) striking sanction or; and (4)in paragraph (7) by striking sanction(s) or.
9.GAO study and report on provider-related fraud (a)StudyThe Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study regarding fraud prevention measures in Federal early childhood education, child care, and child nutrition programs that shall include an analysis of— (1)the effectiveness of procedures and measures to prevent fraud carried out by providers of services under such programs; (2)whether the data the Federal Government receives in connection with such programs (including through audits and reporting requirements) is— (A)sufficient to successfully identify fraud carried out under such programs; and (B)used effectively by the Federal Government to identify potential fraud carried out under such programs; and (3)with respect to the Child Care and Development Block Grant program established under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9857 et seq.)— (A)the program integrity results for States that have delegated responsibilities related to program management and administration to counties, local municipalities, or other entities; and (B)whether any corrective action plans have been implemented by States to improve program integrity results, including any measurable outcomes from implementing such a corrective action plan. (b)ReportNot later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this section, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Education and Workforce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate a report containing— (1)the results of the study conducted under subsection (a); and (2)any regulatory or legislative recommendations to improve fraud prevention measures in Federal early childhood education, child care, and child nutrition programs. (c)Federal early childhood education, child care, and child nutrition programs definedFor the purposes of this section, the term Federal early childhood education, child care, and child nutrition programs includes— (1)Head Start programs (including Early Head Start programs) carried out under the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9831 et seq.); (2)the Child and Adult Care Food Program under section 17 of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1766); and (3)the Child Care and Development Block Grant program established under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9857 et seq.).
10.Fraudulent paymentsSection 658J(b) of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858h(b)) is amended— (1)in paragraph (1) by inserting (including fraudulent payments) after overpayments; and (2)by adding at the end the following: (3)ReportThe State shall submit to the Secretary an annual report that identifies the dollar and percentage amount of improper payments made by the State, disaggregated as specified by the Secretary by standardized payment categories (including suspected and verified fraudulent payments, non-fraudulent overpayments, underpayments, and technically improper payments (e.g., system error payments)).. Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2026.Kevin F. McCumber,Clerk.
119 HR 7726 IH: No Funds for Repeat Child Care Violations Act U.S. House of Representatives 2026-02-26 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I119th CONGRESS2d SessionH. R. 7726IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESFebruary 26, 2026Mrs. Miller of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and WorkforceA BILLTo amend the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 to withhold funds from noncompliant States under suchAct.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the No Funds for Repeat Child Care Violations Act.2.Strengthening the authority to withhold funds for fraudSection 658I(b)(2)(B) of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858g(b)(2)) is amended by striking Secretary may and inserting Secretary shall.
119 HR 7726 : Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026 U.S. House of Representatives 2026-06-04 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. IIB119th CONGRESS2d SessionH. R. 7726IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESJune 4, 2026Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and PensionsAN ACTTo amend the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 to withhold funds from noncompliant States under such Act.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026.2.Strengthening the authority to withhold funds for fraudSection 658I(b)(2)(B) of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858g(b)(2)) is amended by striking Secretary may and inserting Secretary shall.3.Program integrity and accountabilitySection 658E(c)(2) of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858c(c)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following:(W)program integrity and accountabilityThe plan shall include a description of—(i)the State's internal controls to ensure program integrity and accountability;(ii)the processes in place—(I)to investigate and recover fraudulent payments; and(II)to impose sanctions on clients or providers in response to fraud; and(iii)the procedures in place to document and verify eligibility.Such description shall include how the State utilizes data within and across other State and local agencies that have oversight of child care providers that serve children who receive assistance under this subchapter..4.Preventing fraud in the child care and development block grant programSection 658I(b) of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858g(b)) is amended—(1)by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and(2)by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:(3)Determination of fraud(A)InvestigationThe Secretary shall investigate fraud with respect to financial assistance available under this subchapter. (B)DebarmentIn the case that the Secretary makes, or finds that there has been, a final determination of fraud against a child care provider that received financial assistance available under this subchapter, the Secretary shall permanently debar such child care provider from receiving such financial assistance.(C)Providers debarred from Child and Adult Care Food ProgramIn the case that a child care provider has been debarred from participating in the Child and Adult Care Food Program under section 17 of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1766) in accordance with subsection (d)(5)(E)(i) of such section, the Secretary shall permanently debar such child care provider from receiving financial assistance under this subchapter.(D)Final determination of fraud definitionIn this paragraph, the term final determination of fraud means a determination reached in an administrative order or as part of a judicial decision, for which any rights to review or appeal have been exhausted or waived, that a child care provider—(i)knowingly submitted a false statement or documentation to obtain financial assistance available under this subchapter;(ii)misrepresented ownership of, enrollment at, attendance at, or services provided through a program of child care services, or the eligibility of the provider to provide such services, to obtain such financial assistance;(iii)to obtain such financial assistance, operated without the State licensing described in section 658E(c)(2)(F) and without receiving an exception to such licensing;(iv)made a knowing and improper expenditure of such financial assistance; or(v)engaged in any other conduct related to such financial assistance that constituted fraud under Federal or State law..5.Improper payment rate requiring corrective action plan; conditional ineligibilitySection 658J of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858h) is amended—(1)by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (e); and(2)by inserting after subsection (b) the following:(c)improper payment threshold requiring corrective action planIf for a fiscal year the improper payment rate of a State is more than 5 percent of the aggregate amount of payments made to carry out this subchapter by such State for such fiscal year, then such State shall submit to the Secretary—(1)for review and approval a corrective action plan to reduce such rate to not more than 5 percent for each subsequent fiscal year; and(2)such reports as the Secretary may require to show that such State is complying with the requirements of such plan as approved by the Secretary.(d)Conditional ineligibilityIf for each of 2 consecutive fiscal years the improper payment rate of a State determined under this section is more 5 percent, then such State shall be ineligible to receive funds under this subchapter unless such State demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Secretary that such State for the next fiscal year will—(1)reduce such improper payment rate to not more than 5 percent for the next fiscal year; or(2)make significant progress to comply with the corrective action plan approved under subsection (c)..6.Cyclical monitoring of State performanceSection 658K of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858i) is amended by adding at the end the following: (c)Periodic monitoring by the SecretaryAt 3-year intervals, the Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive review of the performance of each State that receives assistance under this subchapter. Based on the results of such review, the Secretary shall designate as high risk a State that has—(1)a high level of unresolved or repeated adverse audit findings submitted under subsection (b);(2)a high level of unresolved issues under, or repeated performance failures to carry out, corrective action plans submitted by such State under section 659J(c); or(3)unresolved or repeat findings of noncompliance with the State plan approved under section 658E(c).(d)Required additional monitoringIf a State is designated as high risk under subsection (a), then the performance of such State shall be subject to additional monitoring, as determined by the Secretary..7.Preventing fraud in the child and adult care food programSection 17(d)(5) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1766(d)(5)) is amended—(1)by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (F); and(2)by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following:(E)Termination due to fraud(i)DebarmentIn the case that the participation of an institution or family or group day care home under the program is terminated due to a final determination of fraud, the Secretary shall permanently debar such institution or family or group day care home from participating in the program.(ii)Providers debarred from Child Care and Development Block Grant programIn the case that an institution or family or group day care home has been debarred from receiving financial assistance under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9857 et seq.) in accordance with section 658I(b)(3)(B) of such Act, the Secretary shall permanently debar such institution or family or group day care home from participating in the program.(iii)Final determination of fraud definitionIn this subparagraph, the term final determination of fraud means a determination reached in accordance with the procedures and requirements of this section, for which any rights to review or appeal have been exhausted or waived, that an institution or family or group day care home—(I)knowingly submitted a false statement or documentation to obtain funds disbursed under subsection (f)(1)(A);(II)misrepresented ownership, enrollment, attendance, or services in connection with the operation of the program by such institution or family or group day care home, or the eligibility of such institution or family or group day care home to operate the program, to obtain such funds;(III)made a knowing and improper expenditure of such funds; or(IV)engaged in any other conduct related to such funds that constituted fraud under Federal or State law..8.Eliminating authority to waive sanctionsSection 658I(c) of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858lg(c)) is amended—(1)in paragraph (1) by striking or sanctions imposed upon a State in accordance with subsection (b)(2);(2)in paragraph (2)—(A)in subparagraph (A) by striking sanction or; and(B)in subparagraph (B) by striking sanction or;(3)in paragraph (3) striking sanction or; and(4)in paragraph (7) by striking sanction(s) or.9.GAO study and report on provider-related fraud(a)StudyThe Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study regarding fraud prevention measures in Federal early childhood education, child care, and child nutrition programs that shall include an analysis of—(1)the effectiveness of procedures and measures to prevent fraud carried out by providers of services under such programs;(2)whether the data the Federal Government receives in connection with such programs (including through audits and reporting requirements) is—(A)sufficient to successfully identify fraud carried out under such programs; and(B)used effectively by the Federal Government to identify potential fraud carried out under such programs; and(3)with respect to the Child Care and Development Block Grant program established under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9857 et seq.)—(A)the program integrity results for States that have delegated responsibilities related to program management and administration to counties, local municipalities, or other entities; and(B)whether any corrective action plans have been implemented by States to improve program integrity results, including any measurable outcomes from implementing such a corrective action plan.(b)ReportNot later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this section, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Education and Workforce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate a report containing—(1)the results of the study conducted under subsection (a); and(2)any regulatory or legislative recommendations to improve fraud prevention measures in Federal early childhood education, child care, and child nutrition programs.(c)Federal early childhood education, child care, and child nutrition programs definedFor the purposes of this section, the term Federal early childhood education, child care, and child nutrition programs includes—(1)Head Start programs (including Early Head Start programs) carried out under the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9831 et seq.);(2)the Child and Adult Care Food Program under section 17 of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1766); and(3)the Child Care and Development Block Grant program established under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9857 et seq.).10.Fraudulent paymentsSection 658J(b) of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858h(b)) is amended—(1)in paragraph (1) by inserting (including fraudulent payments) after overpayments; and(2)by adding at the end the following:(3)ReportThe State shall submit to the Secretary an annual report that identifies the dollar and percentage amount of improper payments made by the State, disaggregated as specified by the Secretary by standardized payment categories (including suspected and verified fraudulent payments, non-fraudulent overpayments, underpayments, and technically improper payments (e.g., system error payments))..Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2026.Kevin F. McCumber,Clerk.
119 HR 7726 RH: No Funds for Repeat Child Care Violations Act of 2026 U.S. House of Representatives 2026-04-06 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. IBUnion Calendar No. 512119th CONGRESS2d SessionH. R. 7726[Report No. 119–592]IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESFebruary 26, 2026Mrs. Miller of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and WorkforceApril 6, 2026Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printedStrike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italicFor text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on February 26, 2026A BILLTo amend the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 to withhold funds from noncompliant States under such Act.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the No Funds for Repeat Child Care Violations Act of 2026.2.Strengthening the authority to withhold funds for fraudSection 658I(b)(2)(B) of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858g(b)(2)) is amended by striking Secretary may and inserting Secretary shall.April 6, 2026Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
The bill's own words, from our database (synced from the GPO BILLS XML); paragraph breaks added at the bill's section boundaries, nothing else changed.
| Date | Chamber | All Actions |
|---|---|---|
| 02/26/2026 | Library of Congress | Introduced in House |
| 02/26/2026 | Library of Congress | Introduced in House |
| 02/26/2026 | House floor actions | Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce. |
| 03/05/2026 | House committee actions | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held |
| 03/05/2026 | House committee actions | Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 20 - 15. |
| 04/06/2026 | Library of Congress | Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-592. |
| 04/06/2026 | House floor actions | Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-592. |
| 04/06/2026 | House floor actions | Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 512. |
| 06/03/2026 | House floor actions | Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1333 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 8646, H.R. 7726, H.R. 7892 and H.R. 8872. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8646 under a structured rule and H.R. 7726, H.R. 7892, and H.R. 8872 under a closed rule, with one hour of general debate on each bill. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on each bill. |
| 06/03/2026 | House floor actions | Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1333. (consideration: CR H3796-3805) |
| 06/03/2026 | House floor actions | Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 8646, H.R. 7726, H.R. 7892 and H.R. 8872. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8646 under a structured rule and H.R. 7726, H.R. 7892, and H.R. 8872 under a closed rule, with one hour of general debate on each bill. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on each bill. |
| 06/03/2026 | House floor actions | DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 7726. |
| 06/03/2026 | House floor actions | The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. |
| 06/03/2026 | House floor actions | Mr. Subramanyam moved to recommit to the Committee on Education and Workforce. (text: CR H3805) |
| 06/03/2026 | House floor actions | The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX. |
| 06/03/2026 | House floor actions | POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 7726, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Subramanyam demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced. |
| 06/03/2026 | House floor actions | Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3811-3812) |
| 06/03/2026 | House floor actions | On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 213 (Roll no. 197). |
| 06/03/2026 | Library of Congress | Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 217 - 207 (Roll no. 198). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H3796-3797) |
| 06/03/2026 | House floor actions | On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 217 - 207 (Roll no. 198). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H3796-3797) |
| 06/03/2026 | House floor actions | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
| 06/04/2026 | Senate | Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. |
| Title Type | Title |
|---|---|
| Short Titles from RFS (Referred to Senate) bill text | Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026 |
| Display Title | Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026 |
| Short Title(s) as Passed House | Stop Child Care Scams Act of 2026 |
| Official Titles from EH (Engrossed in House) bill text | To amend the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 to withhold funds from noncompliant States under such Act. |
| Short Title(s) as Reported to House | No Funds for Repeat Child Care Violations Act of 2026 |
| Short Title(s) as Introduced | No Funds for Repeat Child Care Violations Act |
| Official Title as Introduced | To amend the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 to withhold funds from noncompliant States under suchAct. |
| Amendment | Sponsor | Purpose | Latest Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAMDT 224 | 06/03/2026 On agreeing to the Rules amendment (A001) Agreed to without objection. |
There are no cosponsors of this bill.
| Committee | Activity |
|---|---|
| Senate - Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee | 06/04/2026 Referred To |
| House - Education and Workforce Committee | 06/03/2026 Unknown |
| House - Education and Workforce Committee | 06/03/2026 Unknown |
| House - Education and Workforce Committee | 04/06/2026 Reported By |
| House - Education and Workforce Committee | 03/05/2026 Markup By |
| House - Education and Workforce Committee | 02/26/2026 Referred To |
Policy Area: Families
All data on this page comes from our own database (legislation.congress_* tables), synced daily from the GPO govinfo BILLSTATUS and BILLS collections. Formatted after congress.gov; nothing is generated. Member placement is their DW-NOMINATE score (voteview.com, Lewis et al.) - a measurement of roll-call voting behavior, not our judgement. Buckets: Left below −0.50 · Lean Left to −0.25 · Center to +0.25 · Lean Right to +0.50 · Right above +0.50. The bill's Support meter aggregates the people who signed the bill - sponsor and current cosponsors, each counted once - nothing else.