Only the right has signed this so far (Bill Ranking)
H.R. 8278 · 119th Congress (2025-2026)
2 members · Left 0 · Center 1 · Right 1 (Bill Ranking)
| Sponsor | Rep. Stutzman, Marlin A. (R-IN) (Introduced 04/14/2026) |
|---|---|
| Sponsor Voting Record | Right · DW-NOMINATE +0.72 · measured from every roll-call vote this member has cast (voteview.com) (Sponsor Ranking) |
| Support |
LLLCLRR support across the spectrum: 2 members signed on (Bill Ranking) this bill: sponsor + current cosponsors, each once |
| Committees | House - Financial Services Committee; House - Financial Services Committee; House - Financial Services Committee |
| Latest Action | 06/24/2026 Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 617. |
| Roll Call Votes | There have been no roll call votes |
| Source | view on congress.gov → |
Reported to House (06/24/2026)
Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in Supervision Act
This bill requires specified federal financial agencies to assess their technological capabilities and procurement practices.
Specifically, agencies (the Federal Reserve Board, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Department of the Treasury, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and the National Credit Union Administration) must assess the technology used by the agency and its capabilities to conduct real-time supervisory assessments of entities over which the agency has supervisory authority.
Additionally, the agencies must assess the applicable procurement rules and protocols when acquiring or developing new technological systems and identify any opportunities to streamline these procedures.
Every five years, these agencies must report to specified congressional committees. Among other topics, the report must contain an overview of the technology used in supervisory assessments and any anticipated upgrades, a description of procurement practices, an overview of the agency’s technology development workforce, and details regarding data sharing procedures.
119 HR 8278 IH: Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in Supervision Act U.S. House of Representatives 2026-04-14 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I119th CONGRESS2d SessionH. R. 8278IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESApril 14, 2026Mr. Stutzman (for himself and Mr. Foster) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial ServicesA BILLTo require certain supervisory agencies to assess their technological capabilities, and for other purposes.
1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in Supervision Act.
2.FindingsCongress finds the following: (1)Banking regulators continue to examine and monitor depository institutions without sufficient access to real-time information. (2)Supervisory regulators should leverage technologies to more effectively carry out their duties. (3)When updating supervisory technology, risks surrounding technology procurement must be effectively managed. (4)Agencies’ reliance on outdated technology can create vulnerabilities for the financial system, through— (A)difficulties in collecting, compiling, and analyzing relevant information about risks and noncompliance at supervised firms; (B)reliance on information that is inaccurate, incomplete, or not timely; (C)reliance on limited and outdated tools for data analysis; (D)difficulties in using data to identify risk trends; (E)difficulties in producing accurate and timely reports; (F)inadequacy of cybersecurity safeguards; and (G)failure to detect illegal activities. (5)The rapid expansion of financial firms’ use of artificial intelligence may generate opportunities to improve the financial system while also introducing a range of risks, making it essential that agencies be equipped with the technology, expertise, and skills needed to analyze these opportunities and potential risks. (6)While agencies assess their supervisory capabilities on an ongoing basis, it is imperative that there be a unified goal of enhancing supervisory technologies that ensure effective and sustainable oversight.
3.Technological capabilities and procurement practices assessment (a)In general (1)Technological capabilities assessmentEach covered agency shall, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, assess how existing technologies used by the covered agency pose challenges to the covered agency in conducting adequate, real-time supervisory assessments of entities over which the covered agency has supervisory authority. Such technologies include, as applicable— (A)core information technology infrastructure; (B)technologies used to supervise entities; (C)technologies for monitoring general market risks using reported data and external data; and (D)technologies for data collection, storage, processing, and security. (2)Procurement practices assessmentEach covered agency shall, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section— (A)assess the procurement rules and protocols adhered to by such covered agency when such covered agency acquires or develops new technological systems; and (B)identify any opportunities to further streamline procurement rules and protocols, including an assessment of the impact such rules or protocols have on the ability of the covered agency to test new technological systems, that are within the covered agency’s authority to streamline. (b)ReportNot later than 18 months after the completion of the assessments required under subsection (a), and for every 5 years thereafter, the covered agencies shall coordinate and jointly submit to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate, in a manner that does not pose a risk to the integrity or security of any technologies, systems, or capabilities of covered agencies, regulated entities, or market participants, a report that includes, as applicable, the following with respect to each covered agency: (1)A general overview of hardware and software used for information gathering and advanced analytics during supervision activities, including categories of technology purchased from vendors and developed by the covered agency or contractors of the covered agency. (2)A description of the procurement practices and protocols of the covered agency, including a description of— (A)whether such processes are voluntarily adhered to or mandated; and (B)any opportunities to further streamline procurement rules and protocols, including an assessment of the impact such rules or protocols have on the ability of the covered agency to test new technological systems. (3)A general overview of the portion of the workforce of the covered agency that is engaged materially in technology development within the covered agency, including— (A)an overview of the ability of the covered agency to recruit and retain appropriate technology experts; and (B)a description of the degree to which the covered agency relies on contractors to design, develop, or deploy technology and perform technology-related tasks. (4)A general description of the processes used by the covered agency to obtain information from entities supervised by the covered agency and any impediments thereto, including regulatory obstacles. (5) General information about market and technology trends and risks in the underlying regulated markets including, specific to the covered agency’s jurisdiction— (A) market developments influenced by the adoption of new technologies; (B) the use of new technologies by supervised entities for compliance and risk management purposes; (C) the impact of new technologies on the collection and analysis of data submitted to the covered agencies by supervised entities as required by regulation, including on data quality, interoperability, and standardization; and (D) potential risks, including risks of illicit activity, related to new technologies. (6)A general description of the ways in which the covered agency shares information or system access with other covered agencies and any impediments thereto, including regulatory obstacles. (7)An estimate of the costs for supervised entities to modify systems to share data with covered agencies, as appropriate. (8) A general description of any plans of the covered agency to implement future upgrades to the technology it uses to supervise entities, including— (A) the anticipated timeline for any planned upgrades; (B) the costs of any planned upgrades; (C) any impediments to procuring relevant technologies; (D) plans for hiring and training individuals in connection with technological upgrades; (E) any aspects of any planned upgrades that should be addressed on an interagency basis; (F) any anticipated challenges and opportunities associated with entities supervised by the covered agency adapting to the covered agency’s reporting process, including— (i) estimates of transition costs; and (ii) estimates of any potential cost reductions; and (G) as applicable, the covered agency’s relationships with other covered agencies in their capacity as delegated examiners. (c) Covered agency defined In this section, the covered agency means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Department of the Treasury, including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and the National Credit Union Administration.
119 HR 8278 RH: Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in Supervision Act U.S. House of Representatives 2026-06-24 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. IBUnion Calendar No. 617119th CONGRESS2d SessionH. R. 8278[Report No. 119–711]IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESApril 14, 2026Mr. Stutzman (for himself and Mr. Foster) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial ServicesJune 24, 2026Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printedStrike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italicFor text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on April 14, 2026A BILLTo require certain supervisory agencies to assess their technological capabilities, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in Supervision Act.2.FindingsCongress finds the following:(1)Banking regulators continue to examine and monitor depository institutions without sufficient access to real-time information.(2)Risk surrounding technology procurement may present challenges for updating supervisory technology.(3)To ensure that prudential supervision is effective and sustainable in the digital age, agencies must leverage new technologies to allow for the financial monitoring necessary to preserve a safe and sound banking system.(4)New technological tools are also necessary in order for agencies to effectively fulfill mandates other than prudential supervision, including their mandates to assure consumer protection and monitor Bank Secrecy Act compliance. (5)Agencies’ reliance on outdated technology can create vulnerabilities for the financial system, through—(A)difficulties in collecting, compiling, and analyzing relevant information about risks and noncompliance at supervised firms;(B)reliance on information that is inaccurate, incomplete, or not timely;(C)reliance on limited and outdated tools for data analysis;(D)difficulties in using data to identify risk trends;(E)difficulties in producing accurate and timely reports;(F)inadequacy of cybersecurity safeguards; and(G)failure to detect illegal activities.(6)The rapid expansion of financial firms’ use of artificial intelligence may generate opportunities to improve the financial system while also introducing a range of risks, making it essential that agencies be equipped with the technology, expertise, and skills needed to analyze these opportunities and potential risks.(7)While agencies assess their supervisory capabilities on an ongoing basis, it is imperative that there be a unified goal of enhancing supervisory technologies that ensure effective and sustainable oversight.3.Technological capabilities and procurement practices assessment(a)In general(1)Technological capabilities assessmentEach covered agency shall, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, assess how existing technologies used by the covered agency pose challenges to the covered agency in conducting adequate, real-time supervisory assessments of entities over which the covered agency has supervisory authority. Such technologies include, as applicable—(A)core information technology infrastructure;(B)technologies used to supervise entities;(C)technologies for monitoring general market risks using reported data and external data; and(D)technologies for data collection, storage, processing, and security.(2)Procurement practices assessmentEach covered agency shall, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section—(A)assess the procurement rules and protocols adhered to by such covered agency when such covered agency acquires or develops new technological systems; and(B)identify any opportunities to further streamline procurement rules and protocols, including an assessment of the impact such rules or protocols have on the ability of the covered agency to test new technological systems, that are within the covered agency’s authority to streamline.(b)ReportNot later than 18 months after the completion of the assessments required under subsection (a), and for every 5 years thereafter, the covered agencies shall coordinate and jointly submit to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate, in a manner that does not pose a risk to the integrity or security of any technologies, systems, or capabilities of covered agencies, regulated entities, or market participants, a report that includes, as applicable, the following with respect to each covered agency:(1)A general overview of hardware and software used for information gathering and advanced analytics during supervision activities, including categories of technology purchased from vendors and developed by the covered agency or contractors of the covered agency.(2)A description of the procurement practices and protocols of the covered agency, including a description of—(A)whether such processes are voluntarily adhered to or mandated; and(B)any opportunities to further streamline procurement rules and protocols, including an assessment of the impact such rules or protocols have on the ability of the covered agency to test new technological systems.(3)A general overview of the portion of the workforce of the covered agency that is engaged materially in technology development within the covered agency, including—(A)an overview of the ability of the covered agency to recruit and retain appropriate technology experts; and(B)a description of the degree to which the covered agency relies on contractors to design, develop, or deploy technology and perform technology-related tasks, and a description of related risk management practices for contractors and third-party technologies.(4)A general description of the processes used by the covered agency to obtain information from entities supervised by the covered agency and any impediments thereto, including regulatory obstacles.(5)General information about market and technology trends and risks in the underlying regulated markets including, specific to the covered agency’s jurisdiction—(A)market developments influenced by the adoption of new technologies;(B)the use of new technologies by supervised entities for compliance and risk management purposes;(C)the impact of new technologies on the collection and analysis of data submitted to the covered agencies by supervised entities as required by regulation, including on data quality, interoperability, and standardization; and(D)potential risks, including risks of illicit activity, related to new technologies.(6)A general description of the ways in which the covered agency shares information or system access with other covered agencies and any impediments thereto, including regulatory obstacles.(7)An estimate of the costs for supervised entities to modify systems to share data with covered agencies, as appropriate.(8)A general description of any plans of the covered agency to implement future upgrades to the technology it uses to supervise entities, including—(A)the anticipated timeline for any planned upgrades;(B)the costs of any planned upgrades;(C)any impediments to procuring relevant technologies;(D)plans for hiring and training individuals in connection with technological upgrades;(E)any aspects of any planned upgrades that should be addressed on an interagency basis;(F)any anticipated challenges and opportunities associated with entities supervised by the covered agency adapting to the covered agency’s reporting process, including—(i)estimates of transition costs; and(ii)estimates of any potential cost reductions; and(G)as applicable, the covered agency’s relationships with other covered agencies in their capacity as delegated examiners.(c)Covered agency definedIn this section, the term covered agency means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Department of the Treasury, including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and the National Credit Union Administration.June 24, 2026Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
The bill's own words, from our database (synced from the GPO BILLS XML); paragraph breaks added at the bill's section boundaries, nothing else changed.
| Date | Chamber | All Actions |
|---|---|---|
| 04/14/2026 | Library of Congress | Introduced in House |
| 04/14/2026 | Library of Congress | Introduced in House |
| 04/14/2026 | House floor actions | Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. |
| 05/13/2026 | House committee actions | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held |
| 05/13/2026 | House committee actions | Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 52 - 0. |
| 06/24/2026 | Library of Congress | Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-711. |
| 06/24/2026 | House floor actions | Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-711. |
| 06/24/2026 | House floor actions | Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 617. |
| Title Type | Title |
|---|---|
| Display Title | Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in Supervision Act |
| Official Title as Introduced | To require certain supervisory agencies to assess their technological capabilities, and for other purposes. |
| Short Title(s) as Reported to House | Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in Supervision Act |
| Short Title(s) as Introduced | Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in Supervision Act |
There are no amendments to this bill.
* = Original cosponsor
| Committee | Activity |
|---|---|
| House - Financial Services Committee | 06/24/2026 Reported By |
| House - Financial Services Committee | 05/13/2026 Markup By |
| House - Financial Services Committee | 04/14/2026 Referred To |
No related bill information was received for H.R. 8278.
Policy Area: Finance and Financial Sector
All data on this page comes from our own database (legislation.congress_* tables), synced daily from the GPO govinfo BILLSTATUS and BILLS collections. Formatted after congress.gov; nothing is generated. Member placement is their DW-NOMINATE score (voteview.com, Lewis et al.) - a measurement of roll-call voting behavior, not our judgement. Buckets: Left below −0.50 · Lean Left to −0.25 · Center to +0.25 · Lean Right to +0.50 · Right above +0.50. The bill's Support meter aggregates the people who signed the bill - sponsor and current cosponsors, each counted once - nothing else.