Only the right has signed this so far (Bill Ranking)
H.R. 8365 · 119th Congress (2025-2026)
3 members · Left 0 · Center 0 · Right 3 (Bill Ranking)
| Sponsor | Rep. Biggs, Andy (R-AZ) (Introduced 04/20/2026) |
|---|---|
| Sponsor Voting Record | Right · DW-NOMINATE +0.82 · measured from every roll-call vote this member has cast (voteview.com) (Sponsor Ranking) |
| Support |
LLLCLRR support across the spectrum: 3 members signed on (Bill Ranking) this bill: sponsor + current cosponsors, each once |
| Committees | Senate - Judiciary Committee; House - Judiciary Committee; House - Judiciary Committee; House - Judiciary Committee; House - Judiciary Committee; House - Judiciary Committee |
| Latest Action | 05/18/2026 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. |
| Roll Call Votes | 2 |
| Source | view on congress.gov → |
Reported to House (05/04/2026)
Monitor Accountability Act
This bill requires the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts to establish conditions on the appointment of monitors to oversee state and local governmental entities. A monitor is an independent official appointed to oversee corrective reforms as part of a civil settlement agreement or consent decree, such as to remedy a pattern or practice of unconstitutional policing.
Among the conditions, this bill requires notice and an opportunity for public comment prior to the appointment of a monitor, limits an individual to one monitor appointment at a time, sets a five-year term limit for monitors, and requires a public accounting of the fees charged and services provided by the monitor. It also caps fees and explicitly authorizes the use of pro bono services.
In 2021, the Department of Justice began implementing a set of principles and specific recommendations regarding the use of monitors in civil settlement agreements and consent decrees involving state and local governmental entities, including recommendations relating to term limits, capping fees, and public accountability.
119 HR 8365 EH: Monitor Accountability Act U.S. House of Representatives text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. IB 119th CONGRESS2d Session H. R. 8365
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AN ACT To provide for conditions on the appointment of monitors by courts, and for other purposes.
1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Monitor Accountability Act.
2.Conditions on the appointment of monitors by courts (a)In generalNot later than 180 days after the effective date of this section, the Judicial Conference of the United States shall by rule establish conditions on the appointment by a district court of the United States of any person charged, pursuant to a court order, with monitoring the conduct of a State or unit of local government. Such conditions shall include the following: (1)FeesSuch person— (A)may not assess a fee in excess of such maximum rates as the Judicial Conference of the United States may establish; and (B)shall be authorized to employ the use of pro bono time or reduced rates. (2)Exclusivity and termSuch person may not be— (A)appointed to more than one such monitorship at a time; (B)appointed for a term greater than 5 years; or (C)reappointed after the expiration of such term pursuant to the same court order. (3)Subsequent monitorsA monitor who is appointed to a monitorship after the expiration of the term of a monitor who served pursuant to the same court order may not be employed by the same employer as the previous monitor. (4)Public commentPrior to the appointment of a monitor, the court shall provide notice of the person to be appointed and afford the public an opportunity for comment thereon. (5)Termination (A)RevisionIn the case that a court, a party, or a monitor seeks to revise a monitorship imposed by a court order, the court shall conduct a hearing. (B)Scope of monitorshipThe court may only revise a requirement of a monitorship with respect to which the subject of the monitorship has not attained substantial and sustained compliance. (b)TransferOn the date that is 6 years after the court order imposing a monitorship, if such monitorship is in effect on such date, the case shall be transferred to another judge in the district in which the case is pending. (c)Accounting (1)In generalOn an annual basis, a monitor shall submit to the court imposing the monitorship an accounting, which shall include— (A)information on the services provided and the fee charged for such services; and (B)whether any such services were provided pro bono or at a reduced rate. (2)PublicationThe court shall make available to the public any accounting submitted to the court under paragraph (1). (d)RetroactivityIn the case of a monitorship that is in effect on the date of enactment of this Act and has been in effect for 6 years— (1)a new monitor shall be appointed not later than 180 days after such date of enactment in accordance with the limitations under this section; and (2)the case shall be transferred not later than 1 year after such date of enactment in accordance with this section. (e)Sense of CongressIt is the sense of Congress that monitoring is a public service and monitorships should be structured to encourage the use of pro bono time or reduced rates. Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2026.Kevin F. McCumber,Clerk.
119 HR 8365 IH: Monitor Accountability Act of 2026 U.S. House of Representatives 2026-04-20 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. I119th CONGRESS2d SessionH. R. 8365IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESApril 20, 2026Mr. Biggs of Arizona (for himself, Mr. Fry, and Mr. Nehls) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryA BILLTo provide for conditions on the appointment of monitors by courts, and for other purposes.
1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Monitor Accountability Act of 2026.
2.Conditions on the appointment of monitors by courts (a)In generalNot later than 90 days after the effective date of this section, the Administrator of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall by rule establish conditions on the appointment by a district court of the United States of any person charged, pursuant to a court order, with monitoring the conduct of a State or unit of local government. Such conditions shall include the following: (1)FeesSuch person— (A)may not assess a fee in excess of such maximum rates as the Administrator may establish; and (B)shall be authorized to employ the use of pro bono time or reduced rates. (2)Exclusivity and termSuch person may not be— (A)appointed to more than one such monitorship at a time; (B)appointed for a term greater than 5 years; or (C)reappointed after the expiration of such term pursuant to the same court order. (3)Subsequent monitorsA monitor who is appointed to a monitorship after the expiration of the term of a monitor who served pursuant to the same court order may not be employed by the same employer as the previous monitor. (4)Public commentPrior to the appointment of a monitor, the court shall provide notice of the person to be appointed and afford the public an opportunity for comment thereon. (5)Termination (A)RevisionIn the case that a court, a party, or a monitor seeks to revise a monitorship imposed by a court order, the court shall conduct a hearing. (B)Scope of monitorshipThe court may only revise a requirement of a monitorship with respect to which the subject of the monitorship has not attained substantial and sustained compliance. (b)TransferOn the date that is 6 years after the court order imposing a monitorship, if such monitorship is in effect on such date, the case shall be transferred to another judge in the district in which the case is pending. (c)Accounting (1)In generalOn an annual basis, a monitor shall submit to the court imposing the monitorship an accounting, which shall include— (A)information on the services provided and the fee charged for such services; and (B)whether any such services were provided pro bono or at a reduced rate. (2)PublicationThe court shall make available to the public any accounting submitted to the court under paragraph (1). (d)RetroactivityIn the case of a monitorship that is in effect on the date of enactment of this Act and has been in effect for 6 years— (1)a new monitor shall be appointed not later than 180 days after such date of enactment in accordance with the limitations under this section; and (2)the case shall be transferred not later than 1 year after such date of enactment in accordance with this section. (e)Sense of CongressIt is the sense of Congress that monitoring is a public service and monitorships should be structured to encourage the use of pro bono time or reduced rates.
119 HR 8365 : Monitor Accountability Act U.S. House of Representatives 2026-05-18 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. IIB119th CONGRESS2d SessionH. R. 8365IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESMay 18, 2026Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryAN ACTTo provide for conditions on the appointment of monitors by courts, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Monitor Accountability Act.2.Conditions on the appointment of monitors by courts(a)In generalNot later than 180 days after the effective date of this section, the Judicial Conference of the United States shall by rule establish conditions on the appointment by a district court of the United States of any person charged, pursuant to a court order, with monitoring the conduct of a State or unit of local government. Such conditions shall include the following:(1)FeesSuch person—(A)may not assess a fee in excess of such maximum rates as the Judicial Conference of the United States may establish; and(B)shall be authorized to employ the use of pro bono time or reduced rates.(2)Exclusivity and termSuch person may not be—(A)appointed to more than one such monitorship at a time;(B)appointed for a term greater than 5 years; or(C)reappointed after the expiration of such term pursuant to the same court order.(3)Subsequent monitorsA monitor who is appointed to a monitorship after the expiration of the term of a monitor who served pursuant to the same court order may not be employed by the same employer as the previous monitor.(4)Public commentPrior to the appointment of a monitor, the court shall provide notice of the person to be appointed and afford the public an opportunity for comment thereon.(5)Termination(A)RevisionIn the case that a court, a party, or a monitor seeks to revise a monitorship imposed by a court order, the court shall conduct a hearing.(B)Scope of monitorshipThe court may only revise a requirement of a monitorship with respect to which the subject of the monitorship has not attained substantial and sustained compliance.(b)TransferOn the date that is 6 years after the court order imposing a monitorship, if such monitorship is in effect on such date, the case shall be transferred to another judge in the district in which the case is pending.(c)Accounting(1)In generalOn an annual basis, a monitor shall submit to the court imposing the monitorship an accounting, which shall include—(A)information on the services provided and the fee charged for such services; and(B)whether any such services were provided pro bono or at a reduced rate.(2)PublicationThe court shall make available to the public any accounting submitted to the court under paragraph (1).(d)RetroactivityIn the case of a monitorship that is in effect on the date of enactment of this Act and has been in effect for 6 years—(1)a new monitor shall be appointed not later than 180 days after such date of enactment in accordance with the limitations under this section; and(2)the case shall be transferred not later than 1 year after such date of enactment in accordance with this section.(e)Sense of CongressIt is the sense of Congress that monitoring is a public service and monitorshipsshould be structured to encourage the use of pro bono time or reduced rates. Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2026.Kevin F. McCumber,Clerk.
119 HR 8365 RH: Monitor Accountability Act U.S. House of Representatives 2026-05-04 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. IBUnion Calendar No. 551119th CONGRESS2d SessionH. R. 8365[Report No. 119–635]IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESApril 20, 2026Mr. Biggs of Arizona (for himself, Mr. Fry, and Mr. Nehls) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryMay 4, 2026Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printedStrike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italicFor text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on April 20, 2026A BILLTo provide for conditions on the appointment of monitors by courts, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Monitor Accountability Act.2.Conditions on the appointment of monitors by courts(a)In generalNot later than 180 days after the effective date of this section, the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall by rule establish conditions on the appointment by a district court of the United States of any person charged, pursuant to a court order, with monitoring the conduct of a State or unit of local government. Such conditions shall include the following:(1)FeesSuch person—(A)may not assess a fee in excess of such maximum rates as the Administrator may establish; and(B)shall be authorized to employ the use of pro bono time or reduced rates.(2)Exclusivity and termSuch person may not be—(A)appointed to more than one such monitorship at a time;(B)appointed for a term greater than 5 years; or(C)reappointed after the expiration of such term pursuant to the same court order.(3)Subsequent monitorsA monitor who is appointed to a monitorship after the expiration of the term of a monitor who served pursuant to the same court order may not be employed by the same employer as the previous monitor.(4)Public commentPrior to the appointment of a monitor, the court shall provide notice of the person to be appointed and afford the public an opportunity for comment thereon.(5)Termination(A)RevisionIn the case that a court, a party, or a monitor seeks to revise a monitorship imposed by a court order, the court shall conduct a hearing.(B)Scope of monitorshipThe court may only revise a requirement of a monitorship with respect to which the subject of the monitorship has not attained substantial and sustained compliance.(b)TransferOn the date that is 6 years after the court order imposing a monitorship, if such monitorship is in effect on such date, the case shall be transferred to another judge in the district in which the case is pending.(c)Accounting(1)In generalOn an annual basis, a monitor shall submit to the court imposing the monitorship an accounting, which shall include—(A)information on the services provided and the fee charged for such services; and(B)whether any such services were provided pro bono or at a reduced rate.(2)PublicationThe court shall make available to the public any accounting submitted to the court under paragraph (1).(d)RetroactivityIn the case of a monitorship that is in effect on the date of enactment of this Act and has been in effect for 6 years—(1)a new monitor shall be appointed not later than 180 days after such date of enactment in accordance with the limitations under this section; and(2)the case shall be transferred not later than 1 year after such date of enactment in accordance with this section.(e)Sense of CongressIt is the sense of Congress that monitoring is a public service and monitorships should be structured to encourage the use of pro bono time or reduced rates. May 4, 2026Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
The bill's own words, from our database (synced from the GPO BILLS XML); paragraph breaks added at the bill's section boundaries, nothing else changed.
| Date | Chamber | All Actions |
|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2026 | Library of Congress | Introduced in House |
| 04/20/2026 | Library of Congress | Introduced in House |
| 04/20/2026 | House floor actions | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. |
| 04/22/2026 | House committee actions | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held |
| 04/22/2026 | House committee actions | Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 13 - 11. |
| 05/04/2026 | Library of Congress | Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-635. |
| 05/04/2026 | House floor actions | Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-635. |
| 05/04/2026 | House floor actions | Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 551. |
| 05/12/2026 | House floor actions | Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1275 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, H. Con. Res. 96 and H.R. 8469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, and H.Con.Res. 96 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8469 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order one motion to recommit on each bill. |
| 05/14/2026 | House floor actions | Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1275. (consideration: CR H3480-3486) |
| 05/14/2026 | House floor actions | Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, H. Con. Res. 96 and H.R. 8469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, and H.Con.Res. 96 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8469 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order one motion to recommit on each bill. |
| 05/14/2026 | House floor actions | DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 8365. |
| 05/14/2026 | House floor actions | The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. |
| 05/14/2026 | House floor actions | Mr. Boyle (PA) moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H3486) |
| 05/14/2026 | House floor actions | The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX. |
| 05/14/2026 | House floor actions | POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 8365, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Boyle (PA) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced. |
| 05/14/2026 | House floor actions | Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3507-3509) |
| 05/14/2026 | House floor actions | On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 213 (Roll no. 172). |
| 05/14/2026 | Library of Congress | Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 219 - 204 (Roll no. 173). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H3480) |
| 05/14/2026 | House floor actions | On passage Passed by recorded vote: 219 - 204 (Roll no. 173). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H3480) |
| 05/14/2026 | House floor actions | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
| 05/18/2026 | Senate | Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. |
| Title Type | Title |
|---|---|
| Display Title | Monitor Accountability Act |
| Official Title as Introduced | To provide for conditions on the appointment of monitors by courts, and for other purposes. |
| Short Titles from RFS (Referred to Senate) bill text | Monitor Accountability Act |
| Short Title(s) as Passed House | Monitor Accountability Act |
| Official Titles from EH (Engrossed in House) bill text | To provide for conditions on the appointment of monitors by courts, and for other purposes. |
| Short Title(s) as Reported to House | Monitor Accountability Act |
| Short Title(s) as Introduced | Monitor Accountability Act of 2026 |
| Amendment | Sponsor | Purpose | Latest Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAMDT 213 | 05/14/2026 On agreeing to the Rules amendment (A001) Agreed to without objection. |
* = Original cosponsor
| Committee | Activity |
|---|---|
| Senate - Judiciary Committee | 05/18/2026 Referred To |
| House - Judiciary Committee | 05/14/2026 Unknown |
| House - Judiciary Committee | 05/14/2026 Unknown |
| House - Judiciary Committee | 05/04/2026 Reported By |
| House - Judiciary Committee | 04/22/2026 Markup By |
| House - Judiciary Committee | 04/20/2026 Referred To |
Policy Area: Law
All data on this page comes from our own database (legislation.congress_* tables), synced daily from the GPO govinfo BILLSTATUS and BILLS collections. Formatted after congress.gov; nothing is generated. Member placement is their DW-NOMINATE score (voteview.com, Lewis et al.) - a measurement of roll-call voting behavior, not our judgement. Buckets: Left below −0.50 · Lean Left to −0.25 · Center to +0.25 · Lean Right to +0.50 · Right above +0.50. The bill's Support meter aggregates the people who signed the bill - sponsor and current cosponsors, each counted once - nothing else.