Only the right has signed this so far (Bill Ranking)
S. 182 · 119th Congress (2025-2026)
6 members · Left 0 · Center 0 · Right 6 (Bill Ranking)
| Sponsor | Sen. Risch, James E. (R-ID) (Introduced 01/22/2025) |
|---|---|
| Sponsor Voting Record | Right · DW-NOMINATE +0.55 · measured from every roll-call vote this member has cast (voteview.com) (Sponsor Ranking) |
| Support |
LLLCLRR support across the spectrum: 6 members signed on (Bill Ranking) this bill: sponsor + current cosponsors, each once |
| Committees | Senate - Environment and Public Works Committee |
| Latest Action | 01/22/2025 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. |
| Roll Call Votes | There have been no roll call votes |
| Source | view on congress.gov → |
Introduced in Senate (01/22/2025)
Northwest Energy Security Act
This bill requires Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) operations to be consistent with the preferred alternative in a 2020 environmental impact statement (EIS) decision that focuses on the operations, maintenance, and configuration of dams in the system rather than wild fish restoration. The system includes dams in the Columbia and Snake rivers in Oregon, Washington, Montana, and Idaho.
Specifically, the Bureau of Reclamation, the Bonneville Power Administration, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers must operate the FCRPS consistent with the Columbia River System Operations Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision dated September 2020. Thus, Reclamation, the Bonneville Power Administration, and the Army Corps must follow the EIS rather than the 2023 Resilient Columbia Basin Initiative—and a supplemental EIS proposed in 2024—that focus on wild fish restoration in the Columbia Basin.
The EIS decision may be amended if each agency determines that (1) changes are necessary for public safety or electrical grid reliability, or (2) certain requirements in the decision are no longer necessary.
Further, the bill requires statutory authorization for any structural modification, action, study, or engineering plan that (1) restricts FCRPS hydroelectric dam generation; or (2) limits navigation on the Snake River in Washington, Oregon, or Idaho.
119 S182 IS: Northwest Energy Security Act U.S. Senate 2025-01-22 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. II119th CONGRESS1st SessionS. 182IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESJanuary 22, 2025Mr. Risch (for himself, Mr. Daines, Mr. Sheehy, Mr. Crapo, Ms. Lummis, and Mr. Barrasso) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public WorksA BILLTo provide for operations of the Federal Columbia River Power System pursuant to a certain operation plan for a specified period of time, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThe Act may be cited as the Northwest Energy Security Act.2.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)FCRPSThe term FCRPS means those portions of the Federal Columbia River Power System that are the subject of the Supplemental Opinion.(2)SecretariesThe term Secretaries means—(A)the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation;(B)the Secretary of Energy, acting through the Administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration; and(C)the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers.(3)Supplemental OpinionThe term Supplemental Opinion means the document entitled Columbia River System Operations Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision and dated September 2020.3.Operation of FCRPSThe Secretaries shall operate the FCRPS in a manner consistent with the reasonable and prudent alternative described in the Supplemental Opinion.4.Amendments to supplemental opinion(a)In generalNotwithstanding section 3, the Secretaries may amend portions of the Supplemental Opinion and operate the FCRPS in accordance with those amendments if all of the Secretaries determine, in the sole discretion of each Secretary, that—(1)the amendment is necessary for public safety or transmission and grid reliability; or(2)the actions, operations, or other requirements that the amendment would remove are no longer warranted.(b)Restriction on amendmentsThe process described in subsection (a) shall be the only method by which the Secretaries may operate the FCRPS in any way that is not consistent with the reasonable and prudent alternative set forth in the Supplemental Opinion.5.Limitation on restricting FCRPS electrical generation; clarification(a)Restricting FCRPS electrical generationNo structural modification, action, study, or engineering plan that restricts electrical generation at any FCRPS hydroelectric dam, or that limits navigation on the Snake River in the State of Washington, Oregon, or Idaho, shall proceed unless such proposal is specifically and expressly authorized by a Federal statute enacted after the date of the enactment of this Act. (b)ClarificationNothing in this section affects or interferes with the authority of the Secretaries to conduct operation and maintenance activities or make capital improvements necessary to meet authorized project purposes of FCRPS facilities.
The bill's own words, from our database (synced from the GPO BILLS XML); paragraph breaks added at the bill's section boundaries, nothing else changed.
| Date | Chamber | All Actions |
|---|---|---|
| 01/22/2025 | Library of Congress | Introduced in Senate |
| 01/22/2025 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. |
| Title Type | Title |
|---|---|
| Display Title | Northwest Energy Security Act |
| Short Title(s) as Introduced | Northwest Energy Security Act |
| Official Title as Introduced | A bill to provide for operations of the Federal Columbia River Power System pursuant to a certain operation plan for a specified period of time, and for other purposes. |
There are no amendments to this bill.
* = Original cosponsor
| Committee | Activity |
|---|---|
| Senate - Environment and Public Works Committee | 01/22/2025 Referred To |
Policy Area: Water Resources Development
All data on this page comes from our own database (legislation.congress_* tables), synced daily from the GPO govinfo BILLSTATUS and BILLS collections. Formatted after congress.gov; nothing is generated. Member placement is their DW-NOMINATE score (voteview.com, Lewis et al.) - a measurement of roll-call voting behavior, not our judgement. Buckets: Left below −0.50 · Lean Left to −0.25 · Center to +0.25 · Lean Right to +0.50 · Right above +0.50. The bill's Support meter aggregates the people who signed the bill - sponsor and current cosponsors, each counted once - nothing else.