Only the right has signed this so far (Bill Ranking)
S. 285 · 119th Congress (2025-2026)
3 members · Left 0 · Center 0 · Right 3 (Bill Ranking)
| Sponsor | Sen. Lankford, James (R-OK) (Introduced 01/28/2025) |
|---|---|
| Sponsor Voting Record | Right · DW-NOMINATE +0.59 · measured from every roll-call vote this member has cast (voteview.com) (Sponsor Ranking) |
| Support |
LLLCLRR support across the spectrum: 3 members signed on (Bill Ranking) this bill: sponsor + current cosponsors, each once |
| Committees | Senate - Budget Committee |
| Latest Action | 01/28/2025 Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget. |
| Roll Call Votes | There have been no roll call votes |
| Source | view on congress.gov → |
Introduced in Senate (01/28/2025)
Fairness for Crime Victims Act of 2025
This bill establishes budget points of order in the House of Representatives and the Senate against considering provisions in appropriations legislation that contain changes in mandatory programs (CHIMPs) that would cause the amount available for obligation during the fiscal year from the Crime Victims Fund to be less than the annual average for the three previous fiscal years.
A CHIMP is a provision that (1) would have been estimated as affecting direct spending or receipts if the provision were included in legislation other than an appropriations bill; and (2) results in a net decrease in budget authority in the current year or the budget year, but does not result in a net decrease in outlays over the period of the total of the current year, the budget year, and all fiscal years covered under the most recently adopted budget resolution.
The points of order do not apply if the difference between the amount in the Crime Victims Fund as of September 30 of the fiscal year immediately preceding the fiscal year to which the CHIMP relates and the amount available for obligation under the CHIMP is not more than $2 billion.
98 S285 IS: Fairness for Crime Victims Act of 2025 U.S. Senate 2025-01-28 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. II119th CONGRESS1st SessionS. 285IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESJanuary 28, 2025Mr. Lankford (for himself, Mr. Crapo, and Mr. Risch) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the BudgetA BILLTo curtail the use of changes in mandatory programs affecting the Crime Victims Fund to inflate spending.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Fairness for Crime Victims Act of 2025.2.Point of order against certain changes in mandatory programs affecting the Crime Victims Fund(a)FindingsCongress finds that—(1)the Crime Victims Fund was created in 1984, with the support of overwhelming bipartisan majorities in the House of Representatives and the Senate and the support of President Ronald Reagan, who signed the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–473) into law;(2)the Crime Victims Fund was created based on the principle that funds the Federal Government collects from those convicted of crime should be used to aid those who have been victimized by crime;(3)the Crime Victims Fund is funded from fines, penalties, and forfeited bonds in Federal court and private donations;(4)the Crime Victims Fund receives no taxpayer dollars;(5)Federal law provides that funds deposited into the Crime Victims Fund shall be used to provide services to victims of crime in accordance with the Victims of Crime Act of 1984;(6)the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 gives priority to victims of child abuse, sexual assault, and domestic violence;(7)since fiscal year 2000, Congress has been accounting for funds collected by the Crime Victims Fund, but not disbursing the full amount provided for under the Victims of Crime Act of 1984;(8)over $10,000,000,000 has been withheld from victims of child abuse, sexual assault, domestic violence, and other crimes;(9)from fiscal year 2010 through fiscal year 2014, the Crime Victims Fund collected $12,000,000,000, but Congress disbursed only $3,600,000,000 (or 30 percent) to victims of crime;(10)since fiscal year 2015, Congress has increased disbursals from the Crime Victims Fund to victims of crime, but a permanent solution is necessary to ensure consistent disbursals to victims of crime who rely on these funds every year;(11)under budget rules, Congress represents that the money it has already spent in prior years is still in the Crime Victims Fund and available for victims of crime; (12)it is time to restore fairness to crime victims; and (13)funds collected by the Crime Victims Fund should be used for services to and compensation of crime victims in accordance with the Victims of Crime Act of 1984.(b)AmendmentTitle IV of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:CAdditional limitations on budgetary and appropriations legislation441.Point of order against changes in mandatory programs affecting the Crime Victims Fund(a)DefinitionsIn this section—(1)the term CHIMP means a provision that—(A)would have been estimated as affecting direct spending or receipts under section 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 902) (as in effect prior to September 30, 2002) if the provision was included in legislation other than an appropriation Act; and(B)results in a net decrease in budget authority in the current year or the budget year, but does not result in a net decrease in outlays over the period of the total of the current year, the budget year, and all fiscal years covered under the most recently adopted concurrent resolution on the budget;(2)the term Crime Victims Fund means the Crime Victims Fund established under section 1402 of the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 (34 U.S.C. 20101); and(3)the term 3-year average amount means the annual average amount that was deposited into the Crime Victims Fund during the 3-fiscal-year period beginning on October 1 of the fourth fiscal year before the fiscal year to which a CHIMP affecting the Crime Victims Fund applies.(b)Point of order in the Senate(1)Point of order(A)In generalExcept as provided in subparagraph (C), in the Senate, it shall not be in order to consider a provision in a bill or joint resolution making appropriations for all or a portion of a fiscal year, or an amendment thereto, amendment between the Houses in relation thereto, conference report thereon, or motion thereon, that contains a CHIMP that, if enacted, would cause the amount available for obligation during the fiscal year from the Crime Victims Fund to be less than the 3-year average amount.(B)Point of order sustainedIf a point of order is made by a Senator against a provision described in subparagraph (A), and the point of order is sustained by the Chair, that provision shall be stricken from the measure and may not be offered as an amendment from the floor.(C)LimitationA point of order shall not lie in the Senate under this paragraph if the difference between the amount in the Crime Victims Fund as of September 30 of the fiscal year immediately preceding the fiscal year to which the CHIMP described in subparagraph (A) relates and the amount available for obligation under the CHIMP described in subparagraph (A) is not more than $2,000,000,000. (2)Form of the point of orderA point of order under paragraph (1) may be raised by a Senator as provided in section 313(e).(3)Conference reportsWhen the Senate is considering a conference report on, or an amendment between the Houses in relation to, a bill or joint resolution, upon a point of order being made by any Senator pursuant to paragraph (1), and such point of order being sustained, such material contained in such conference report or House amendment shall be stricken, and the Senate shall proceed to consider the question of whether the Senate shall recede from its amendment and concur with a further amendment, or concur in the House amendment with a further amendment, as the case may be, which further amendment shall consist of only that portion of the conference report or House amendment, as the case may be, not so stricken. Any such motion in the Senate shall be debatable to the same extent as the conference report or House amendment, as the case may be. In any case in which such point of order is sustained against a conference report (or Senate amendment derived from such conference report by operation of this subsection), no further amendment shall be in order.(4)Supermajority waiver and appealIn the Senate, this subsection may be waived or suspended only by an affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members, duly chose and sworn. An affirmative vote of three-fifths of Members of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn shall be required to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under this subsection.(5)DeterminationFor purposes of this subsection, budgetary levels shall be determined on the basis of estimates provided by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate.(c)Point of order in the House of Representatives(1)In general(A)Point of orderExcept as provided in subparagraph (B), a provision in a bill or joint resolution making appropriations for a fiscal year that proposes a CHIMP that, if enacted, would cause the amount available for obligation during the fiscal year from the Crime Victims Fund to be less than the 3-year average amount shall not be in order in the House of Representatives.(B)LimitationSubparagraph (A) shall not apply if the difference between the amount in the Crime Victims Fund as of September 30 of the fiscal year immediately preceding the fiscal year to which the CHIMP described in subparagraph (A) relates and the amount available for obligation under the CHIMP described in subparagraph (A) is not more than $2,000,000,000. (2)Amendments and conference reportsIt shall not be in order in the House of Representatives to consider an amendment to, or a conference report on, a bill or joint resolution making appropriations for a fiscal year if such amendment thereto or conference report thereon proposes a CHIMP that, if enacted, would cause the amount available for obligation during the fiscal year from the Crime Victims Fund to be less than the 3-year average amount.(3)DeterminationFor purposes of this subsection, budgetary levels shall be determined on the basis of estimates provided by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the House of Representatives..(c)Technical and conforming amendmentThe table of contents in section 1(b) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 428 the following:PART C—Additional limitations on budgetary and appropriations legislationSec. 441. Point of order against changes in mandatory programs affecting the Crime Victims Fund..
The bill's own words, from our database (synced from the GPO BILLS XML); paragraph breaks added at the bill's section boundaries, nothing else changed.
| Date | Chamber | All Actions |
|---|---|---|
| 01/28/2025 | Library of Congress | Introduced in Senate |
| 01/28/2025 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget. |
| Title Type | Title |
|---|---|
| Display Title | Fairness for Crime Victims Act of 2025 |
| Short Title(s) as Introduced | Fairness for Crime Victims Act of 2025 |
| Official Title as Introduced | A bill to curtail the use of changes in mandatory programs affecting the Crime Victims Fund to inflate spending. |
There are no amendments to this bill.
* = Original cosponsor
| Committee | Activity |
|---|---|
| Senate - Budget Committee | 01/28/2025 Referred To |
No related bill information was received for S. 285.
Policy Area: Economics and Public Finance
All data on this page comes from our own database (legislation.congress_* tables), synced daily from the GPO govinfo BILLSTATUS and BILLS collections. Formatted after congress.gov; nothing is generated. Member placement is their DW-NOMINATE score (voteview.com, Lewis et al.) - a measurement of roll-call voting behavior, not our judgement. Buckets: Left below −0.50 · Lean Left to −0.25 · Center to +0.25 · Lean Right to +0.50 · Right above +0.50. The bill's Support meter aggregates the people who signed the bill - sponsor and current cosponsors, each counted once - nothing else.