The New York TimesLean left
← All coverage gaps
2026-09-12 13:32
How the Heroic Response to 9/11 Went Awry
50%50%
2 outlets · Left 1 · Center 0 · Right 1
How each side titled it
RealClearPoliticsLean right
What the Rational Domestic Response to 9/11 Would Have Been
Each wing's outermost outlet, headline quoted verbatim - framing shows clearest at the edges. Center outlets appear with every other headline below.
Who got there first
each line: one outlet's first article — above the track left · below right · across center
First reported by The New York Times (Lean left); 2 outlets over 27h. The right followed 27h later.
The New York Times · +27h RealClearPolitics
What each side is saying
- The New York TimesLean left
Twenty-five years later, it is important to step back from today’s cynicism and remember the heroism and national unity in the hours and days after the attacks.
Read at nytimes.com → - RealClearPoliticsLean right
The rational domestic response to 9/11 would have been for the federal government to engage in an extensive study of Islam, Sharia, the ideology and practices of both violent jihadist organizations and
Read at realclearpolitics.com →
Each blurb is the outlet's own feed summary, quoted unedited. Nothing here is generated.
2 articles, newest first · filter by side
RealClearPoliticsLean right
What the Rational Domestic Response to 9/11 Would Have Been
Read at realclearpolitics.com →The New York TimesLean left
How the Heroic Response to 9/11 Went Awry
Read at nytimes.com →Every headline that clustered into this story, newest first. Links go straight to the publisher - no article text is stored here, and the one image is an unmodified copy of the publisher's own thumbnail.